2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fish-passable barrier to stop the invasion of non-indigenous crayfish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a specific example, eDNA could be used to monitor for crayfish invasions above barriers constructed to protect upstream populations of highly imperilled native crayfishes, providing early warnings if these management interventions have failed or been breached (Frings et al . ). Furthermore, a large proportion of native crayfishes are globally imperilled with extinction (Richman et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a specific example, eDNA could be used to monitor for crayfish invasions above barriers constructed to protect upstream populations of highly imperilled native crayfishes, providing early warnings if these management interventions have failed or been breached (Frings et al . ). Furthermore, a large proportion of native crayfishes are globally imperilled with extinction (Richman et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on the theory of propagule pressure, an assessment of how many individuals will spread across a barrier can improve predictions of how likely population establishment in new environments above barriers will be (Drolet & Locke, ; Lockwood, Cassey, & Blackburn, ). This information is crucial for decision makers both in and outside academia, who increasingly need to balance the need for making barriers passable to native species and the opportunity of blocking invasive species’ dispersal (Frings et al., ; Hirsch et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study has demonstrated that dark culverts do not inhibit adult white-clawed crayfish spatial behaviour in any obvious way, this is under the assumption that changes in light conditions are the only habitat alteration caused by the culvert. Likely alterations in substrate habitat adjacent and in the culvert, presence of vertical barriers within the culvert (Bubb et al, 2008;Frings et al, 2013), as well as potential degradation of water quality (Mazza et al, 2011;Peay and Füreder, 2011), certainly have the capacity to influence entrance to and movement through a culvert by crayfish. So too does predation vulnerability; in the current study it appears that a lack of bed complexity in box concrete box culverts exposed crayfish to rat predation.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, structures that may act as barriers to movement through alteration of habitat or by creating physically impassable barriers are expected to contribute to the fragmentation of populations. The majority of studies that relate crayfish distribution and movement to river impoundments such as culverts have focused primarily on the potential of culverts and weirs to limit the geographical spread of introduced species of crayfish (Light, 2003;Kerby et al, 2005;Dana et al, 2011;Foster and Keller, 2011;Frings et al, 2013;Maceda-Veiga et al, 2013), thus further highlighting the potential ability of these structures to negatively impact native species of crayfish. Culverts can restrict movement and limit dispersal of crayfish, as well as other aquatic animals by causing the elevation of water velocity, increasing channel homogeneity and alteration of river bed structure, or creating direct barriers through the positioning of elevated culvert outlets and mini weirs (Bubb et al, 2008;Souty-Grosset and Reynolds, 2009;Franklin and Bartels, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%