2018
DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2018.1446904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A first test of unattended, acoustic recorders for monitoring CapercaillieTetrao urogalluslekking activity

Abstract: A first test of unattended, acoustic recorders for monitoring capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) lekking activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may not be the case ecologically, but it is the case practically, in terms of both the lek counts and using acoustic recorders. The recorders were sufficiently spaced to avoid any double counting in the acoustic data, with separation distances of 260 m between sites 8535 and 8607, and 85 m between sites 8552 and 9306 (Venier et al 2012;Sedláček et al 2015;Abrahams and Denny 2018). Site names and details are not given here due to landowner confidentiality.…”
Section: Lek Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may not be the case ecologically, but it is the case practically, in terms of both the lek counts and using acoustic recorders. The recorders were sufficiently spaced to avoid any double counting in the acoustic data, with separation distances of 260 m between sites 8535 and 8607, and 85 m between sites 8552 and 9306 (Venier et al 2012;Sedláček et al 2015;Abrahams and Denny 2018). Site names and details are not given here due to landowner confidentiality.…”
Section: Lek Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dataset was analysed using a semi-automated system to identify Capercaillie vocalizations in the recordings, with a three-stage process to produce a Capercaillie call 'recognizer' and final output. An additional dataset was used for recognizer training, consisting of recordings collected in the same area of Scotland in 2016 (Abrahams and Denny 2018). This 2016 dataset consisted of 1586 .wav files (28.2 GB data) collected over 14 days at three lek sites.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method uses automated recording units, which can be deployed in the field for days or weeks at a time to capture animal sounds. The advantages of this approach include the production of a standardised, longduration, permanent dataset and record of species identification, which can be repeatedly analysed and subject to validation by independent reviewers (Abrahams & Denny, 2018;Celis-Murillo et al, 2009;Rempel et al, 2005). Automated recorders can be synchronized to occur simultaneously across large spatial extents, reducing temporal variability in studies (Brandes, 2008;Furnas & Callas, 2015;MacKenzie & Nichols, 2004), and offering large data volumes at low cost and with little resourcing requirement (Acevedo & Villanueva-Rivera, 2006;Hill et al, 2018;Holmes et al, 2014;Zwart et al, 2014).…”
Section: Bioacoustics For Biodiversity Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of species vocalizations is commonly done either by complete manual analysis or, increasingly, by the use of automated recognizers, which require the a priori compilation and analysis of a large library of known species vocalizations (Knight et al, 2017;Shonfield & Bayne, 2017). Our analysis workflow included automated clustering of the acoustic data set, followed by manual validation of candidate vocalizations of the target species (Abrahams & Denny, 2018). This process has two benefits.…”
Section: Bioacoustic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%