2008
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A first look at Landau-gauge propagators in G2Yang-Mills theory

Abstract: G 2 Yang-Mills theory is an interesting laboratory to investigate nonperturbative effects. On one hand, no conventional quark confinement via a linearly rising potential is present. On the other hand, its thermodynamic properties are similar to ordinary SU(N ) Yang-Mills theory. Finally, it has been conjectured that gluons are removed from the physical spectrum in the same way as in SU(N ) Yang-Mills theory. The last claim will be explored by determining the Landau-gauge ghost and gluon propagators, as well as… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(192 reference statements)
5
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bottom panels show the same, but for gauge algebras su(3-6) and g 2 in MLG [175]. Further lattice results can be found in [91,95,117,118,122,135,253] The situation for the maxB gauge is drastically different [84]. In this case, the ghost propagator is much more divergent than even the scaling case, and more divergent than the results in any of the other gauges.…”
Section: Correlation Functions 411 Propagatorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bottom panels show the same, but for gauge algebras su(3-6) and g 2 in MLG [175]. Further lattice results can be found in [91,95,117,118,122,135,253] The situation for the maxB gauge is drastically different [84]. In this case, the ghost propagator is much more divergent than even the scaling case, and more divergent than the results in any of the other gauges.…”
Section: Correlation Functions 411 Propagatorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The bottom panels show the same, but for gauge algebras su(3-6) and g 2 in MLG [175]. Further lattice results can be found in [91,95,117,118,123,135,251,[253][254][255].…”
Section: Correlation Functions 411 Propagatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest simple and simply connected Lie group with a trivial center is the 14 dimensional exceptional Lie group G 2 . This is one reason why G 2 gauge theory with and without Higgsfields has been investigated in series of papers [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Although there is no symmetry * bjoern.wellegehausen@uni-jena.de, wipf@tpi.uni-jena.de and Christian.Wozar@uni-jena.de reason for a deconfinement phase transition in G 2 gluodynamics it has been conjectured that a first order deconfinement transition without order parameter exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing all this in mind, it is not surprising that the G 2 lattice gauge theory was actively investigated in the past, both at zero and finite temperature [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. What is probably surprising is that the results of these analysis gave a picture much similar to that of standard SU(N ) theory: the spectrum of the G 2 theory at zero temperature is composed only of color neutral objects [11,12,15], the string tension at intermediate distances (i.e.…”
Section: Jhep03(2015)006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is probably surprising is that the results of these analysis gave a picture much similar to that of standard SU(N ) theory: the spectrum of the G 2 theory at zero temperature is composed only of color neutral objects [11,12,15], the string tension at intermediate distances (i.e. before string breaking [20]) satisfies Casimir scaling [13,18,20], a first order deconfinement transition is present [14,16,22], (quenched) chiral symmetry is broken in the low temperature phase and restored above the critical temperature [19], the topological susceptibility is suppressed above deconfinement [21], propagators [17] and thermodynamical observables (like e.g. pressure and trace anomaly) [22] do not show any qualitative difference with respect to the SU(N ) case.…”
Section: Jhep03(2015)006mentioning
confidence: 99%