2006
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9096-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite macro-element for corroded reinforced concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multistrand anchorages and wires will be evaluated in this test bed facility during the next phase of this research effort. Load ( lbf ) Information on the use of analytical methods for assessing the detrimental effects of corrosion damage on structures can be found in Francois et al (2006) and for assessing the effects of broken wires in MacDougal and Bartlett (2005).…”
Section: Signature Fixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multistrand anchorages and wires will be evaluated in this test bed facility during the next phase of this research effort. Load ( lbf ) Information on the use of analytical methods for assessing the detrimental effects of corrosion damage on structures can be found in Francois et al (2006) and for assessing the effects of broken wires in MacDougal and Bartlett (2005).…”
Section: Signature Fixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length necessary for the ordinary reinforcing bars to redevelop the full tension force in the concrete, lost by the occurrence of the crack, is the transfer length L t [5]. The strain variation of the ordinary reinforcing steel is assumed non linear along the transfer length in accordance with experimental observations [6]. The function distribution of the steel strain ε s (x) is given by Eq.…”
Section: Steel Strain Distribution Between Two Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ΔA s0 is the section loss threshold that initiates the first crack [9], ΔA sm is the average section loss of the reinforcing bar along L elem [10], n = 5 is an empirical parameter describing the quantitative variation of the progressive debonding versus the section loss of the reinforcement [6]. This damage variable is also included in the calculation of the neutral axis evolution in uncracked cross-section versus corrosion propagation: y 0nc (D c ) = y 0c + (1-D c )(y 0nc -y 0c ).…”
Section: Corrosion Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the transmission length is infinite (L t = ∞), I a is equal to the inertia of the cracked cross-section, I c . The ratio L t to L elem /2 can be evaluated through experiments on tension members cast with the same concrete of the beam and the same bonded reinforcing bars [7]. It could also be evaluated from analytical models available in the literature such as the FIB-MC90 [18] or from Piyasena et al [19].…”
Section: Fig 4 Shows the Theoretical Variation Of Average Inertia I mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of deflections after cracking is based on a new macro finite element (M.F.E.). This M.F.E., initially developed for reinforced concrete structures [7], is extended to the case of prestressed concrete structures in this paper. It is a beam finite element (for bending problems) characterized mainly by its homogeneous average inertia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%