2020
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Finite Element Model for Estimation of Contact Dynamics During a Jumping Movement on a Trampoline

Abstract: In order to fully understand contact dynamics on a trampoline, a simulation approach using a musculoskeletal model coupled with a dynamic model of the trampoline is essential. The purpose of the study was to examine dynamics and selected lower extremity muscle forces in a landing and jumping movement on a trampoline, using a combination of finite element modeling and musculoskeletal modeling. The rigid frame of the trampoline was modeled in ADAMS and coupled with a finite element model of the elastic trampolin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During trampoline jumps, Glitsch and Henrichs 11 used pressure insoles to measure a maximum force of 7.5 BW under one foot for jumps between 1.6 and 2.5 m, whereas a combination of finite element modeling and musculoskeletal modeling estimated the peak force to range between 5.8 and 7.7 BW at one foot contact with the trampoline. 4 If the forces are assumed to be equally distributed under each foot, the total should be approximately 15 BW in trampoline. This value is in agreement with the present results, despite differences in the surface material, jump height and landing technique.…”
Section: Maximum Peak Loading Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During trampoline jumps, Glitsch and Henrichs 11 used pressure insoles to measure a maximum force of 7.5 BW under one foot for jumps between 1.6 and 2.5 m, whereas a combination of finite element modeling and musculoskeletal modeling estimated the peak force to range between 5.8 and 7.7 BW at one foot contact with the trampoline. 4 If the forces are assumed to be equally distributed under each foot, the total should be approximately 15 BW in trampoline. This value is in agreement with the present results, despite differences in the surface material, jump height and landing technique.…”
Section: Maximum Peak Loading Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trampolinists usually flex their legs during landing and extend their legs during take-off to be fully extended at the lowest point and capture the elastic energy of the trampoline. 3,4 Researchers showed that a strategy to minimize landing impact is to produce a smooth landing through bending of the ankles, knees, and hips. When landing in basketball or volleyball, flexions of the lower extremities can reduce impact forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the floor based CMJ the gymnast must perform both flexion and extension of the lower limbs whilst in contact with the ground. In contrast during a trampoline jump, the entire flexion phase occurs exclusively in the downward aerial phase prior to contact with the bed, with hip and knee angles on contact with the being reported between 25° and 40° and 20° and 40°, respectively (Qian et al, 2020; Rupf & Chapman, 2013). Gymnasts also begin to extend the lower limbs prior to contact with the bed as they fall from height, and continue through lower limb extension on contact with the trampoline bed, with both hip and knee angles reported to be less than 10° at the end of the jump cycle (Rupf & Chapman, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, maximising energy transferral from the gymnast to the bed to achieve maximal ToF could explain why F 0 was identified as the most important determinant in this study and hence the importance of maximal strength in these gymnasts. The quadriceps and gluteus maximus have been suggested to play important roles in maximising energy transferral on the bed (Qian et al, 2020). F 0 as calculated by loaded CMJ's is highly determined by maximal isometric strength and size of the knee extensors (Morales-Artacho et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation