2019
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.oa-2017-0166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Finite Element Method for a Phase Field Model of Nematic Liquid Crystal Droplets

Abstract: We develop a novel finite element method for a phase field model of nematic liquid crystal droplets.The continuous model considers a free energy comprised of three components: the Ericksen's energy for liquid crystals, the Cahn-Hilliard energy representing the interfacial energy of the droplet, and a weak anchoring energy representing the interaction of the liquid crystal molecules with the surface tension on the interface (i.e. anisotropic surface tension). Applications of the model are for finding minimizers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, our method has the following advantages: (a) no assumption is made on the mesh structure (other than being shape regular); (b) the Ericksen energy can be very general (not just the one-constant approximation); (c) the method non-linearly couples full electro-statics, which was not done previously. Therefore, our result is more general than in [33,70,71].…”
Section: γ-Convergence Of the Femmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, our method has the following advantages: (a) no assumption is made on the mesh structure (other than being shape regular); (b) the Ericksen energy can be very general (not just the one-constant approximation); (c) the method non-linearly couples full electro-statics, which was not done previously. Therefore, our result is more general than in [33,70,71].…”
Section: γ-Convergence Of the Femmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We show that the finite element approximation of the discrete energy (3.18) Γ-converges to the continuous energy (2.42). The result presented here is not the same as the result shown in [70,71] or in [33], all of which used a special discretization of the Ericksen energy that is limited to the one constant approximation (5.2). Furthermore, their discretization requires the underlying mesh to be weakly acute in order to prove Γ-convergence of their method; the weakly acute assumption is quite severe for three-dimensional meshes [51,52,86].…”
Section: γ-Convergence Of the Femmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations