2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0363(20000615)33:3<375::aid-fld13>3.3.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element method for free surface flows of incompressible fluids in three dimensions. Part I. Boundary fitted mesh motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it allows the size of the boundary deformation imposed at each sub-step to be controlled by the value of K. This iterative approach could be replaced by other non-linear extensions of the surface displacement, e.g. considering the volume mesh as a hyperelastic material, which might be more robust in the case of very large deformations (see a stricking example in Cairncross et al (2000), p. 382). Notice that each solution of (11) on the reference meshT h automatically yields a deformation which preserves the topology of the reference mesh, i.e.…”
Section: D-shape Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it allows the size of the boundary deformation imposed at each sub-step to be controlled by the value of K. This iterative approach could be replaced by other non-linear extensions of the surface displacement, e.g. considering the volume mesh as a hyperelastic material, which might be more robust in the case of very large deformations (see a stricking example in Cairncross et al (2000), p. 382). Notice that each solution of (11) on the reference meshT h automatically yields a deformation which preserves the topology of the reference mesh, i.e.…”
Section: D-shape Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the mesh movement is constrained by a number of parameters (one for each spine used), thus reducing the computational overhead in exchange for restricting the generality of the approach. More general ALE forms have also been widely used for free-surface problems, based upon maintaining mesh quality [115,116], Laplacian smoothing [129] or pseudo-solid deformation [33,144]. Other applications which have benefited from successful ALE algorithms include phase-change problems [123], viscous sintering [84,94,151] and the interaction of free surfaces with solid boundaries [4,133,145].…”
Section: Ale (Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By summing (4.31) over i the c i satisfy 33) since the w i 's form a partition of unity and mass is conserved. (We note in passing that the local conservation principle (4.2) corresponds to choosing the w i to be the characteristic function in ℩(t).)…”
Section: Distributed Mass-conserving Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere, the mesh moves in an arbitrary manner. An example of an ALE implementation can be found in [Sackinger, Schunk and Rao, 1996] for 2D and extended to 3D by [Cairncross et al, 2000]. This nodal mesh velocity is defined by differentiating the position of the nodes with respect to time.…”
Section: Dynamic Discretization Via Moving Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%