2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element method approach to compare the wear of acetabular cups in polyethylene according to their lateral tilt in relation to the coronal plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to several numerical studies, higher cup inclination angles result in higher linear wear [58,88,91] due to high contact stress, but lower volumetric wear [18,19,58,127] resulting from reduced contact area (sliding distance), as is in agreement with some hip simulator testing [128,129]. However, higher volumetric wear has been observed with higher inclination angles in other clinical [15], hip simulator [88,130] and FEA modelling studies [91]. Further investigation is hence necessary to understand the difference amongst various FEA, laboratory and clinical studies, especially under the edge loading condition induced by steep cup inclination and lateral separation.…”
Section: Liner/shell Conformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to several numerical studies, higher cup inclination angles result in higher linear wear [58,88,91] due to high contact stress, but lower volumetric wear [18,19,58,127] resulting from reduced contact area (sliding distance), as is in agreement with some hip simulator testing [128,129]. However, higher volumetric wear has been observed with higher inclination angles in other clinical [15], hip simulator [88,130] and FEA modelling studies [91]. Further investigation is hence necessary to understand the difference amongst various FEA, laboratory and clinical studies, especially under the edge loading condition induced by steep cup inclination and lateral separation.…”
Section: Liner/shell Conformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all of the numerical models on polyethylene liner wear prediction implemented the Archard’s wear law, 85 either in its original form 2123,46,48,5054,5658,61,66,69,8691 or modified forms, 18,19,25,31,41,49, 60,65,67,68,92,93 mostly in commercial FEA software (e.g. Ansys or Abaqus) by means of user-defined routines.…”
Section: Fea Wear Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those computational models tried to simulate the stress distribution between the contact surfaces of THA components as functions of the relative displacements performed by each machine. Results suggest that the kinematic and kinetic characteristics directly affect the wear rates, even though a function relating them to the machines' testing parameters could not be established [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, an alternative method, FEM, has been proposed for use across a variety of wear simulations, such as pin-on-plate, 4,11 block-on-ring, 12 brake system, 13,14 and total hip prosthesis in bioengineering. 7,15,16 In FEM wear simulation, Po˜dra and Andersson 4 found that the incremental size may affect the accuracy and stability of the simulation results. Therefore, Ö qvist 5 proposed different incremental sizes to analyze the accuracy and stability of the simulation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%