1996
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/29/7/025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element investigation into a soft rolling contact supplied by a non-Newtonian ink

Abstract: A study of numerical modelling and experiments of a soft rolling nip contact is described. A power law equation was found to be adequate in modelling the positive pressure zone in the nip, but was not capable of describing the film rupture pressure adequately. The index and exponent in the power law were noted to affect nip behaviour significantly and similarly. A shear rate cut-off model was used successfully to avoid singularity in the viscosity field at the mid-thickness and was found not to affect the beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Provided that the contact width is small in comparison with the roller diameter and the analysis plane is some distance from the roller edge then the Reynolds equation can be written in a one‐dimensional form asThe assumption of a Newtonian fluid is retained in this work and this is shared with many other publications (MacPhee et al , 1992; Bohan et al , 1997). Some printing inks are non‐Newtonian and this can affect the flow characteristics (Lim et al , 1996), however this will be described in a separate investigation. In this solution, the pressure at the inlet and outlet were set to zero together with the pressure gradient, satisfying a well‐established Swift‐Steiber condition.…”
Section: Reynolds Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Provided that the contact width is small in comparison with the roller diameter and the analysis plane is some distance from the roller edge then the Reynolds equation can be written in a one‐dimensional form asThe assumption of a Newtonian fluid is retained in this work and this is shared with many other publications (MacPhee et al , 1992; Bohan et al , 1997). Some printing inks are non‐Newtonian and this can affect the flow characteristics (Lim et al , 1996), however this will be described in a separate investigation. In this solution, the pressure at the inlet and outlet were set to zero together with the pressure gradient, satisfying a well‐established Swift‐Steiber condition.…”
Section: Reynolds Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has since been developed to evaluate different modes of lubrication dependent on the nip conditions (Hooke, 1986). These have then been further extended to different inlet and process conditions for Newtonian (MacPhee et al , 1992; Bohan et al , 1997) and non‐Newtonian fluids (Lim et al , 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigations reported in references [7] and [8] used the finite element method to investigate the junction between two printing rollers in offset printing. Solutions for deformation and pressure were obtained initially using a dry contact analysis.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bohan et al 17 explored the non-Newtonian fluid behaviour in soft elastohydrodynamic nip contacts, and found the viscosity coefficient, power law index and sliding ratio all affect the nip flow rate and film thickness in a non-linear manner. Lim et al 18 adopted a shear rate cut-off model to predict the positive film pressure zone to analyse the EHL behaviour of soft rolling contacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%