2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2009.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element approach for modelling single-phase compressible flow in dual porosity systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are based on the (1) equivalent continuum medium or equivalent porous medium (EPM), [1][2][3][4][5] (2) discrete fracture network (DFN), [6][7][8][9][10][11] and (3) fractured porous medium (FPM) or dual-medium flow models. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The FPM flow model considers that the groundwater simultaneously flows within fractures and through the block matrices in which the fractures are embedded. The fluid is exchanged between rock matrices and fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are based on the (1) equivalent continuum medium or equivalent porous medium (EPM), [1][2][3][4][5] (2) discrete fracture network (DFN), [6][7][8][9][10][11] and (3) fractured porous medium (FPM) or dual-medium flow models. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The FPM flow model considers that the groundwater simultaneously flows within fractures and through the block matrices in which the fractures are embedded. The fluid is exchanged between rock matrices and fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this kind of model can benefit from the advantages of both the EPM (representing the flow in the block matrices) and DFN models (simulating the high conductivity of the fractures). Domain discretization methods, such as finite element method (FEM) 16,17 and finite volume method, 12,18 considerably hinder the generation of an appropriate mesh for a domain comprising numerous randomly distributed fractures. Lang et al 21 used a commercial nonuniform rational basis spline three-dimensional (3-D) modeling software to prepare the model geometries and a commercial Octree mesher in a noninteractive manner to generate tetrahedral-triangular finite element meshes required for studying the permeability tensor of a 3-D fractured porous rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The explicit approach considers the exact spatial position and hydraulic property of each fracture deterministically, while the implicit approach takes into account the influences of fractures by means of the equivalent permeability tensor. The explicit approach can be further divided into two kinds of models: the discrete fracture network (DFN) model (Kalbacher et al , 2007; Erhel et al , 2009; Mustapha, 2011a; Jiang et al , 2013, 2014; Mohajerani et al , 2015, 2017; Lei et al , 2017) and the fractured porous medium (FPM) model (Hoteit and Firoozabadi, 2008; Hattingh and Reddy, 2009; Nick and Matthai, 2011; Blessent et al , 2011; Mourzenko et al , 2011; Huang et al , 2014; Yao et al , 2015; Pouya, 2015; Verde and Ghassemi, 2016). The DFN model neglects the permeability of rock matrix, while the FPM model considers simultaneously the influences of fractures and rock matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Yao [7] applied multiscale finite element method to simulate two-phase flow in fractured media used discrete fracture model; Hajibeygi and Karvounis [8] devised an iterative multiscale finite volume method for the simulation of multiphase flow in fractured porous media used hierarchical fracture model. Because the parameters of discrete fracture model and hierarchical fracture model are difficulty to obtained, dual porosity model [9] are used in this paple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%