The use of thin-wall laminated cylindrical tubes is currently of considerable interest for the material property characterization of hard composites. In view of this interest, a numerical finite-element analysis has been reported in Reference [ 1 ] which characterizes tube responses to axial tension/compression, torsion and internal pressurization as a function of the tube geometry, material, ply orientation and end constraints. In brief, it was found that for infinitely long tubes an accurate prediction of tube behavior can be obtained from the closed form solution of Sherrer [2]. However, this solution doesn't easily lend itself to the determination of elastic moduli from test data. Moreover, the numerical calculations associated with this solution are extremely cumbersome and chances for error are numerous. On the other hand, the solution of Whitney & Halpin [3] using thin shell theory is found to be considerably more ef6cient for determining elastic moduli provided thickness/diameter ratio is less than 0.05. Stress predictions in [3], however, may not always be quite as accurate.The present note is concerned with gaining insight into the effect of tube length on modulus determination test by solving exactly the boundary value problem proposed in [3] for a thin tube and the special case of a balanced layup. The boundary value problem to be considered is expressed mathematically as:The coordinate frame is defined in Figure 1. (Note that 0 is symbolic and that UB is the engineering displacement and not a tensor displacement; i.e., V = ro d0. )All other notations will be consistent with the standard notation used in [3].For the special case of a balanced laminate, under axisymmetric loads, the governing equations specialize to: Equilibrium: