1991
DOI: 10.1029/90ja02241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite difference solution of the polar electrojet current mapping boundary value problem

Abstract: An investigation is made of how the polar electrojet currents and associated electric fields map down to the ground. The boundary value problem which characterizes the downward mapping of the electrojet current will be formulated using potential theory. The electrojet current is represented by a simple Cowling model in which the geomagnetic field is vertical. A numerical solution to the electrojet mapping boundary value problem is obtained via a finite difference technique. This model is employed to study the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Juneau is ∼10° E of magnetic North from HAARP, the dipole orientation is likely within 10° of magnetic EW. We assume here that the fields do not rotate as they exit the ionosphere, as described by Werner and Ferraro [1991], because the peak altitude of generation is near or below where the ambient Hall conductivity becomes dominant at higher altitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since Juneau is ∼10° E of magnetic North from HAARP, the dipole orientation is likely within 10° of magnetic EW. We assume here that the fields do not rotate as they exit the ionosphere, as described by Werner and Ferraro [1991], because the peak altitude of generation is near or below where the ambient Hall conductivity becomes dominant at higher altitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the magnetometer measurements are likely dominated by the strongest electrojet altitudes (100 -120 km), which are usually above the altitudes of HF heating (70 -90 km). The currents at these altitudes may not necessarily be in the same direction [Werner and Ferraro, 1991].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%