2014
DOI: 10.14513/actatechjaur.v7.n2.242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Finite Difference Method of High Order Accuracy for the Solution of Two-Point Boundary Value Problems

Abstract: We present a new high order finite difference method for second order differential equation y x f x, y subject to boundary conditions y a α and y b β . The method is based on rational function approximation and its development is based on power series expansions. Under appropriate conditions, local truncation error calculated and order of method estimated six. Our finite difference method leads to nonlinear system of equations. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness, efficiency and high o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An implementation of fixed step size is the most commonly used in deriving numerical method (Anakira et al 2013;Jator 2012;Jikantoro et al 2015;Pandey 2014). However, the utilization of variable step size strategy in the numerical method had been adopted by several researchers such as Cash and Girdlestone (2006), Majid and Suleiman (2006), Majid et al (2012) and Waeleh et al (2011b).…”
Section: (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An implementation of fixed step size is the most commonly used in deriving numerical method (Anakira et al 2013;Jator 2012;Jikantoro et al 2015;Pandey 2014). However, the utilization of variable step size strategy in the numerical method had been adopted by several researchers such as Cash and Girdlestone (2006), Majid and Suleiman (2006), Majid et al (2012) and Waeleh et al (2011b).…”
Section: (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we plan to modify our method in the following three aspects: (1) Apply our method to noncoordinate system; (2) Find out more solutions to the scattering and optimization. (3) Conduct more in-depth research on mathematical analysis of our method, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] is our potential research basis.…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, several numerical discretization schemes mainly in a family of the finite difference schemes have been proposed to form a new finite difference discretization scheme. For example, the standard finite difference [18], Chebyshev finite difference [19] and Rational Finite Difference [20] are imposed for solving TPBVPs. Clearly, the development of Chebyshev finite difference and Rational Finite Difference schemes has been encouraged by the combination of the standard finite difference concept together with the Chebyshev and rational approximation functions respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the development of Chebyshev finite difference and Rational Finite Difference schemes has been encouraged by the combination of the standard finite difference concept together with the Chebyshev and rational approximation functions respectively. In conjunction with these combinations, the author in [20] also introduced a new finite difference scheme via the combination of exponential ASTESJ ISSN: 2415-6698 approximations and finite difference discretization schemes which is known as exponential finite difference discretization schemes to show its capability for solving TPBVPs [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%