1973
DOI: 10.2514/3.50502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Finite-Difference Method for Transonic Airfoil Design

Abstract: This paper describes an inverse method for designing transonic airfoil sections or for modifying existing profiles. Mixed finite-difference procedures are applied to the equations of transonic small disturbance theory to determine the airfoil shape corresponding to a given surface pressure distribution. The equations are solved for the velocity components in the physical domain, and flows with embedded shock waves can be calculated. To facilitate airfoil design, the method allows alternating between inverse an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For convenience, n is the unit normal on the boundary. The far-field boundary condition given by ( 9) is consistent with the infinity condition stated by (3).…”
Section: The Computational Domainsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For convenience, n is the unit normal on the boundary. The far-field boundary condition given by ( 9) is consistent with the infinity condition stated by (3).…”
Section: The Computational Domainsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although significant progress has been made in developing computational methods for fluid flow analysis, the methods for the design and optimization of aircraft configuration are still in their infancy. Among the many techniques that have been developed, the inverse design method [1][2][3][4][5][6] is perhaps the most widely used. This method is severely restrictive because its depends on the experience and knowledge of the designer to establish desirable velocity or pressure distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative finite difference methods have been explored by Steger and Klineberg, 12 Tranen, 13 Carlson, 14 Shankar et al, 15 and Volpe,16 wherein the design problem is treated as an inverse problem, i.e., the airfoil shape that supports a given pressure distribution is found by iteration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%