1991
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4149(91)90091-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite characterization of weak lumpable Markov processes. Part I: The discrete time case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This being stated, we can use this necessary condition to obtain "candidate" lumpings of E leading to an aggregated markovian process, as in [1]. This condition allows the preselection of "candidate" partitions before applying the characterization of weak lumpability in terms of the solution to some linear systems [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This being stated, we can use this necessary condition to obtain "candidate" lumpings of E leading to an aggregated markovian process, as in [1]. This condition allows the preselection of "candidate" partitions before applying the characterization of weak lumpability in terms of the solution to some linear systems [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions are very expensive to verify: in the worst case, the cost grows exponentially with the number of states [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach developed in [6], [12] consists of identifying the conditional probability IP α (X n+1 ∈ C(m)|X n ∈ C(l), . .…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of our paper is to explore how the set A M may differ from A π . We adopt in Section 3 a somewhat different approach from Rubino and Sericola's [12] to characterize the set A M . Indeed we directly use the necessary stochastic equivalence between the aggregated process and a homogeneous Markov chain with state spaceŜ and t.p.m.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%