2006
DOI: 10.2737/psw-gtr-197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A field guide to insects and diseases of California oaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there has been a notable summary of studies and compilation of pests and pathogens that cause damage on oak species in Califomia (47), the current study is one of tbe first comprebensive assessments for fungal species in aboveground symptomatic woody tissues of coast live oak in California that also screened frequently recovered fungi for pathogenicity. Tbis study bas identified a new fungal species, Cryptosporiopsis querciphila sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there has been a notable summary of studies and compilation of pests and pathogens that cause damage on oak species in Califomia (47), the current study is one of tbe first comprebensive assessments for fungal species in aboveground symptomatic woody tissues of coast live oak in California that also screened frequently recovered fungi for pathogenicity. Tbis study bas identified a new fungal species, Cryptosporiopsis querciphila sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oak woodlands support higher levels of biodiversity than any other terrestrial ecosystem in California (47). Coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) is a common evergreen tree that dominates oak woodlands throughout western North America, from Mendocino County, CA to Baja California, Mexico (40).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To-date in the USA, this scale insect has been found only in California, where it is called Kuwana oak scale (Gill, 1993;Ben-Dov, 2005). Colour photographs and field information are provided by Swiecki & Bernhardt (2006), who report that infestations in California tend to be highly localised in distribution. In Solano and Yolo counties, adult females and nymphs of various instars have been collected in different years in every month from March to July and in November, and immature males in at least March (based on dates of collections in the California State Collection of Arthropods, CDFA, Sacramento, and those of PJG from Yolo and Napa counties).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not verify the presence of P. ramorum in our diseased plots, but we are confident that these plots were indeed infected because (a) mortality levels were very high and no other agent is known to cause such severe and widespread mortality of tanoak [26], (b) presence of the pathogen has been previously confirmed in the general vicinity of all diseased plots [5,27,28], and (c) characteristic symptoms of SOD (see [8]) were common. Some of our "healthy" plots may also have been infected with P. ramorum (areas that are entirely unaffected have become very rare at many infected sites), but any resulting tanoak mortality was much lower than in our "diseased" plots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%