A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations.

Stone, Eugene F.; Gueutal, Hal G.; Gardner, Donald G.; McClure, Stephen L.

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.3.459

Cited by 292 publications

(177 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

156

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding is consistent with some recent research indicating that individuals feel more positively about their control over personal information in the case of employers than in the case of other types of organizations such as insurance companies, credit grantors, and lending institutions (Stone, Gueutal, McClure, & Gardner, 1980). It is noted that the incidence of upsetting internal uses of information was twice the magnitude of the incidence of upsetting external disclosures.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

A Survey of Employee Perceptions of Information Privacy in Organizations.

Woodman¹,

Ganster²,

Adams³

et al. 1982

Academy of Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

A Survey of Employee Perceptions of Information Privacy in Organizations.

Woodman¹,

Ganster²,

Adams³

et al. 1982

Academy of Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A number of privacy theorists have put emphasis on the concept of control when defining privacy. For example, Stone et al [57] viewed privacy as the ability of the individual to control personal information about one's self. This control perspective of privacy is also found in prior privacy studies, which posited that loss of control over disclosure and use of personal information is central to the notion of invasion of privacy [15].…”

Section: Phase I: Conceptual Investigation Of End-user Petsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Value Sensitive Design Investigation of Privacy Enhancing Tools in Web Browsers

Crossler

Bélanger

2012

Decision Support Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f oPrivacy concern has been identified as a major factor hindering the growth of e-business. Recently, various privacy-enhancing tools (PETs) have been proposed to protect the online privacy of Internet users. However, most of these PETs have been designed using an ad hoc approach rather than a systematic design. In this paper, we present an exploratory investigation of an end-use PET using a Value Sensitive Design approach. We propose an integrated design of a Privacy Enhancing Support System (PESS) with three proposed tools, namely privacy-enhancing search feature (PESearch), privacy-enhancing control for personal data (PEControl), and privacy-enhancing review for sharing the ratings and reviews of websites' privacy practices (PEReview). This system could enhance the interactivity of Internet users' privacy experiences, increase users' control perceptions over their personal information, and reduce their privacy concerns. An empirical evaluation of PESearch, PEControl, and PEReview revealed that novices felt the most important aspect of the tools for downloading and usage intentions was its usefulness; most experts felt the tool met the design principles as specified.

show abstract

“…Privacy is thus treated as the desire for selective and adequate control over data and information -both incoming and outgoing. For example, Stone et al [Stone, Gueutal et al 1983] describe privacy as "ability of the individual to personally control information about oneself" whereas Samarajiva [1998] To summarize, the social perspective focuses on what practices relate to privacy, while the normative discussions look at whether a particular behavior is ethically (or legally) justified. The technical discourse is concerned with how the ethical and social understandings can be represented formally, and implemented practically in an operational system.…”

Section: Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%