SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1190/1.3054781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A field comparison of 3‐C land streamer versus planted geophone data

Abstract: A land streamer survey was successfully conducted by the CREWES Project in an area located in the foothills of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. The land streamer experiment was composed of two 3-C receiver lines located side-byside: the land streamer and a planted geophone. Comparison of raw shot gathers, amplitude spectra and stacked sections showed that the vertical channel data quality was found to be similar for both datasets, while the radial channel data was found to have highest quality for the planted geo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently an increasing number of studies have been made using standard geophones connected to metallic baseplates. Such systems have been applied to seismic reflection (van der Veen et al 2001; Link, Speece and Betterly 2006; Vangkilde, Dahl and Ringgaard 2006; Pullan et al 2008; Suarez and Stewart 2008; Inazaki and Nakanishi 2009) as well as to multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) (Leech 2006; Lane et al 2008). A number of commercial systems have also appeared on the market making it an ever more available way of performing land seismic profiles over long extensions and hard surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently an increasing number of studies have been made using standard geophones connected to metallic baseplates. Such systems have been applied to seismic reflection (van der Veen et al 2001; Link, Speece and Betterly 2006; Vangkilde, Dahl and Ringgaard 2006; Pullan et al 2008; Suarez and Stewart 2008; Inazaki and Nakanishi 2009) as well as to multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) (Leech 2006; Lane et al 2008). A number of commercial systems have also appeared on the market making it an ever more available way of performing land seismic profiles over long extensions and hard surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of a land streamer is that it saves acquisition time. The data quality of the land-streamer is very comparable to the traditional acquisition technique [41]. However, land-streamers suffer from two limitations; the first is land-streamers are usually less than 150 m in length with 48 to 120 receivers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%