2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-011-9123-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A few thoughts on brain ROIs

Abstract: Quantitative mapping of structural and functional connectivities in the human brain via non-invasive neuroimaging offers an exciting and unique opportunity to understand brain architecture. Because connectivity alterations are widely reported in a variety of brain diseases, assessment of structural and functional connectivities has emerged as a fundamental research area in clinical neuroscience. A fundamental question arises when attempting to map structural and functional connectivities: how to define and loc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7. Our interpretation of this discrepancy is that functional connectivity analysis results heavily depend on the selection of ROIs in the brain (Liu 2011). In (Rathi et al 2011), the ROIs were defined by 90 anatomically-defined brain regions, such as gyri determined by the traditional Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas, and then fMRI signals were averaged within each anatomic region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7. Our interpretation of this discrepancy is that functional connectivity analysis results heavily depend on the selection of ROIs in the brain (Liu 2011). In (Rathi et al 2011), the ROIs were defined by 90 anatomically-defined brain regions, such as gyri determined by the traditional Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas, and then fMRI signals were averaged within each anatomic region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, determination of meaningful and consistent ROIs for brain connectivity mapping is a very challenging task, as outlined in a recent review article in (Liu 2011). Briefly, these challenges include unclear boundaries between cortical regions, remarkable variability of anatomy and function across different brains and high nonlinearity of ROI properties, e.g., a slight change of the size, shape or location could significantly alter the structural and/or functional connectivity of the ROI in consideration (Liu 2011). One promising solution to these challenges is to maximize the group-wise consistency of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived structural connection profiles within a corresponding ROI across subjects, as demonstrated in (Zhu et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of associations between anatomically distinct time series is referred to as "functional connectivity" [140]. The ability to identify consistent, reproducible, and accurate regions of interest is the key to developing connectivity maps [142]. Using a new strategy to develop cortical landmarks (dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmarks, DICCOLs), Li et al [143] used functional connectomics signatures to identify 10 brain regions with structurally disrupted landmarks that could be used to distinctly identify prenatal cocaine exposed brains from that of controls.…”
Section: Novel Applications Of Imaging Methods and Statistical Technimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voxels and ROIs were determined manually based on neuroscience domain knowledge or automatically based on activation detection using task-fMRI. Although voxels and ROIs-based methods are easy to implement and effective in many existing works, their reproducibility, generalizability and reliability have been limited due to the lack of a common and individualized representation of human brain architecture as pointed out in (Liu 2011;Chen et al 2014). To be specific, voxel-based methods pose difficulties in assessing the consistency of encoding models across subjects due to the intrinsic variability of brain structure and functions and thus the lack of precise voxelwise correspondence between subjects (Liu 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although voxels and ROIs-based methods are easy to implement and effective in many existing works, their reproducibility, generalizability and reliability have been limited due to the lack of a common and individualized representation of human brain architecture as pointed out in (Liu 2011;Chen et al 2014). To be specific, voxel-based methods pose difficulties in assessing the consistency of encoding models across subjects due to the intrinsic variability of brain structure and functions and thus the lack of precise voxelwise correspondence between subjects (Liu 2011). Recently, we developed and validated a novel data-driven strategy, namely DICCCOL (dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmarks) , to discover consistent and corresponding structural landmarks across various brains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%