1987
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(87)90114-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feedback finite element method with a posteriori error estimation: Part I. The finite element method and some basic properties of the a posteriori error estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
158
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
158
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the startling papers [2,3] the understanding and practical realization of adaptive refinement schemes in a finite element context has been documented in numerous publications [3,4,5,13,36]. A key ingredient in most adaptive algorithms are a-posteriori error estimators or indicators derived from the current residual or the solution of local problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the startling papers [2,3] the understanding and practical realization of adaptive refinement schemes in a finite element context has been documented in numerous publications [3,4,5,13,36]. A key ingredient in most adaptive algorithms are a-posteriori error estimators or indicators derived from the current residual or the solution of local problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This principle is used in all adaptive approaches. For an analysis of this and similar approaches, we refer to [4], [7].…”
Section: Adaptivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed methods based on the use of SA-field, like the error in constitutive equation (Ladevèze, 1975;Ladevèze and Leguillon, 1983) or like the equilibrated residuals (Babuška and Rheinboldt, 1978;Babuška and Miller, 1987), provide efficient error estimators, for global or local quantities (Ladevèze and Moës, 1999;Prudhomme and Oden, 1999;Ohnimus et al, 2001;Becker and Rannacher, 2001), even in some nonlinear contexts (Babuška and Rheinboldt, 1982;Ladevèze et al, 1986;Ladevèze, 2001;Louf et al, 2003) and domain decomposition methods (Parret-Fréaud et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%