1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8890(97)00044-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feedback control structure for on-line learning tasks

Abstract: This paper addresses adaptive control architectures for systems that respond autonomously to changing tasks. Such systems often have many sensory and motor alternatives and behavior drawn from these produces varying quality solutions. The objective is then to ground behavior in control laws which, combined with resources, enumerate closed-loop behavioral alternatives. Use of such controllers leads to analyzable and predictable composite systems, permitting the construction of abstract behavioral models. Here, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whenever basic motion patterns are acquired through interaction with the environment, the possibility of critical failures increases. The issues of safety during gait learning using an actual robot are considered by Huber and Grupen (1997). One of their safety constraints requires that the walking robot should always remain statically stable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever basic motion patterns are acquired through interaction with the environment, the possibility of critical failures increases. The issues of safety during gait learning using an actual robot are considered by Huber and Grupen (1997). One of their safety constraints requires that the walking robot should always remain statically stable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to such actions can make tasks easier to solve, if they effectively solve subtasks within the domain. There are several approaches to defining such temporally-extended actions: options (Sutton et al, 1999), skills (Konidaris and Barto, 2009;Konidaris et al, 2010), activities (Barto and Mahadevan, 2003), modes (Alur et al, 2000), and behaviors (Huber and Grupen, 1997;Brooks, 1986).…”
Section: Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These kinds of skills are not characterized by goal regions but rather by desired dynamic behavior, such as desired limit cycles. Little work has been done on creating options of this type, although much work in robotics is relevant, such as the methods used in the biped walker of Tedrake et al (2004) and the control-basis approach of Grupen and colleagues (Hart and Grupen 2011, 2012, Huber and Grupen 1997.…”
Section: Summary and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%