2000
DOI: 10.1109/78.815481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feedback approach to the steady-state performance of fractionally spaced blind adaptive equalizers

Abstract: Abstract-This paper proposes a new approach to the analysis of the steady-state performance of constant modulus algorithms (CMA), which are among the most popular adaptive schemes for blind equalization. A major feature of the proposed feedback approach is that it bypasses the need for working directly with the weight error covariance matrix. In so doing, approximate expressions for the steady-state mean-square error of several CM algorithms are derived, including CMA2-2, CMA1-2, normalized CMA, and a new norm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without loss of generality, for the 16-QAM signal we derive the steady-state MSE performance of the proposed algorithm without noise using the method proposed in [6]. The key formula for evaluating the steady-state MSE of the adaptive algorithm is […”
Section: Steady-state Mse Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without loss of generality, for the 16-QAM signal we derive the steady-state MSE performance of the proposed algorithm without noise using the method proposed in [6]. The key formula for evaluating the steady-state MSE of the adaptive algorithm is […”
Section: Steady-state Mse Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For constant modulus signals, such as 4-QAM, a CMA-based fractionally spaced equalizer (FSE) can achieve a zero steady-state mean-square error (MSE) in noiseless channels. For non-constant modulus signals, such as high-order QAM signals which have been used for a long time in LTE mobile networks [5], it suffers a relatively large misadjustment resulting in a large steady-state MSE [4,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady state MSE for the proposed R RECT CA algorithm can be approximated by using equ. (3) and procedure given in [1] and [18]. For an adaptive algorithm of the form…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the terms Q 1 and Q 2 are identical, so an appropriate expression for steady-state MSE E |e a | 2 . Based on mathematical analysis given in [1] and [18], the error function of R RECT CA with elimination of time index is given as: After some simplification and replacing R 2 RECT with R we have:…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 which is corresponding to the C R in figure 2. It is clear that the CMA cost function attempts to drive the equalizer output to lie on a circle of radius C R , which is not precise for the high-order QAM signals and the cost function of CMA can not become exactly zero even when the channel is perfectly equalized [8][9][10]. We consider that if the adaptation accord with the modulus which is corresponding to the decision of the equalizer's output signal then it can obtain the faster convergence rate and lower MSE.…”
Section: The Modulus Of High-order Qam Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%