Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1871437.1871652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feature-word-topic model for image annotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But they are clearly different because our approach imposes the regularization over the topic distribution instead of the latent variables and moreover our approach deals multiple modalities and makes use of additional visual similarity to formulate the regularization term. Our approach is also different from topic models for image annotation [4,2,28,29]: The image tagging problem in our paper is more challenging than image annotation as aforementioned. and moreover the proposed regularized LDA aims to impose the consistency of tags within similar images while they are supervised algorithms [28,29] or aim to find common topics shared by tags and visual contents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But they are clearly different because our approach imposes the regularization over the topic distribution instead of the latent variables and moreover our approach deals multiple modalities and makes use of additional visual similarity to formulate the regularization term. Our approach is also different from topic models for image annotation [4,2,28,29]: The image tagging problem in our paper is more challenging than image annotation as aforementioned. and moreover the proposed regularized LDA aims to impose the consistency of tags within similar images while they are supervised algorithms [28,29] or aim to find common topics shared by tags and visual contents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic image tagging or annotation problem is usually regarded as an image classification task. Typical techniques [2,4,7,9,11,12,14,16,20,28,29,33] usually learn a generative/discriminative multi-class classifier from the training data, to construct a mapping function from low level features extracted from the images to tags, and then predict the annotations or tags for the test images. Later, a more precise formulation is presented to regard it as a multi-label classification problem by exploring the relations between multiple labels [15,30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Akbas et al (Akbas and Vural, 2007) fused binary classifiers by learning a new meta classifier from categorymembered vectors, which are generated from the binary classifiers. Nguyen et al (Nguyen et al, 2010) proposed a feature-word-topic model in which one individual classifier is learned for each label based on visual features. By modeling topics of words, the authors then refine the results from binary classifiers to obtain topic-oriented annotation for later image retireval.…”
Section: Classification-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering an image as an exam-ple and its instances as feature vectors extracted from subregions of the image, the problem of image annotation naturally fits the multi-instance setting. There were several studies (Carneiro et al, 2007;Nguyen et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2006) that have successfully applied MIL to the problem of image annotation. One disadvantage of those methods is that they treated instances (sub-regions in images) equally for every label.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%