2002
DOI: 10.1155/2003/548678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feature Set for Cytometry on Digitized Microscopic Images

Abstract: Feature extraction is a crucial step in most cytometry studies. In this paper a systematic approach to feature extraction is presented. The feature sets that have been developed and used for quantitative cytology at the Laboratory for Biomedical Image Analysis of the GSF as well as at the Center for Image Analysis in Uppsala over the last 25 years are described and illustrated. The feature sets described are divided into morphometric, densitometric, textural and structural features. The latter group is used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
110
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In Boland and Murphy (2001) a standard feature set for subcellular location characterization was introduced and extended to a large set of 2D and 3D image features (Huang and Murphy 2004). Also in other fields of microscopy image classification, a wide range of image features has been studied (e.g., Ronneberger et al 2002;Lindblad et al 2003;Rodenacker and Bengtsson 2003;Pincus et al 2007). A general overview of commonly used image feature types is given, e.g., Theodoridis and Koutroumbas (1999).…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Boland and Murphy (2001) a standard feature set for subcellular location characterization was introduced and extended to a large set of 2D and 3D image features (Huang and Murphy 2004). Also in other fields of microscopy image classification, a wide range of image features has been studied (e.g., Ronneberger et al 2002;Lindblad et al 2003;Rodenacker and Bengtsson 2003;Pincus et al 2007). A general overview of commonly used image feature types is given, e.g., Theodoridis and Koutroumbas (1999).…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proven in many studies that chromatin distribution corresponds to the state of malignancy. Two basic approaches to analysis of a chromatin constitution are known [9]. Within the first, structural, the chromatin distribution is considered as a local arrangement of rather small objects of varying intensity.…”
Section: Properties Of Cell Images and Requirements To The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of known textural methods [9] is their sensitivity parameters and conditions of image acquisition, to properties of researched preparations, and also to precision of microscope focusing.…”
Section: Properties Of Cell Images and Requirements To The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing techniques based on digital microscopy [13][14][15][16] , however, are time-consuming and resource-demanding, as images are typically captured for the entire sample area, or even through three-dimensional space [17][18][19][20] , followed by stitching and processing to identify and quantitate targets of interest. Their quantification is also less accurate, because different types of noise and background emission interfere in the measurement of absolute intensities, and targets that are randomly located at the periphery of the field-of-view (FOV) have large variation in excitation and detection efficiencies [21][22][23] . The key to realising a simplified accessible technique for quantitative luminescence measurements lies in the improvements in both the signal-to-background contrast and the pinpointing precision with which each target is brought to the centre of the FOV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%