2017
DOI: 10.1631/fitee.1601322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feature selection approach based on a similarity measure for software defect prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those features which are more relevant to the class and irrelevant to other features are preferred. Moreover, we apply three feature ranking approaches, including similarity measure (SM) [30], correlation (CL) [31] and gain ratio (GR) [32]. SM is designed to update the feature weights based on the similarity measure, and we can get a feature ranking list by sorting the feature weights in descending order.…”
Section: Cross-project Defect Prediction With Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those features which are more relevant to the class and irrelevant to other features are preferred. Moreover, we apply three feature ranking approaches, including similarity measure (SM) [30], correlation (CL) [31] and gain ratio (GR) [32]. SM is designed to update the feature weights based on the similarity measure, and we can get a feature ranking list by sorting the feature weights in descending order.…”
Section: Cross-project Defect Prediction With Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodriguez et al (2014) proposed a key for defect removal and defect prediction. He made a list of metrics first and then used it for software defect prediction [4,6]. Elish et al (2008) used the Naï ve Bayes classifier for predicting software defects and achieved 71 percent accuracy on fault detection [7][8].…”
Section: Related Work Donementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al (2010) and Gray et al( 2011) proposed several defect prediction models using classical available techniques in machine learning with MDP datasets. However, they ignored the class imbalance issue, making their results biased and erroneous [4][5]. Adopting a systematic approach, we propose a novel defect prediction system using feature selection for removing noisy and irrelevant attributes and entropy for the class imbalance problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors' approach overlooked this in their approach. In [12], Qiao et al proposed a feature weighted approach based on a distance measure for software defect prediction. The authors designed a ranking algorithm that maintains a rank list of the features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [11] is particularly noteworthy because of the authors' contribution to developing a baseline experiment that most researchers followed since. This allowed a direct comparison of the different approaches proposed in literature [12], [13]. Six issues with existing state-of-the-art techniques were discussed in [14] and while there have been a few papers that try to address the issues raised in the paper, some of the core problems still remain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%