2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-013-2601-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feature-Scale Greenwood–Williamson Model for Metal Chemical Mechanical Planarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4] In CMP process, a rotating wafer with different types of design structures is pushed against a rotating polishing pad which is immersed in slurries containing chemicals and abrasive particles. Pattern structures on the wafer surface are first chemically passivated by slurry chemicals and then removed by effects of contact interactions of abrasive particles which are trapped between the pad and the wafer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4] In CMP process, a rotating wafer with different types of design structures is pushed against a rotating polishing pad which is immersed in slurries containing chemicals and abrasive particles. Pattern structures on the wafer surface are first chemically passivated by slurry chemicals and then removed by effects of contact interactions of abrasive particles which are trapped between the pad and the wafer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A variety of materials and structures, including copper damascene metallization, oxides in shallow trench isolation (STI) and inter-level dielectrics (ILD), replacement metal gate for high-k metal gate (HKMG) structures and fin field effect transistor (FinFET) devices are polished with different slurries. [2][3][4] In CMP process, a rotating wafer with different types of design structures is pushed against a rotating polishing pad which is immersed in slurries containing chemicals and abrasive particles. Pattern structures on the wafer surface are first chemically passivated by slurry chemicals and then removed by effects of contact interactions of abrasive particles which are trapped between the pad and the wafer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Therefore, CMP attracts numerous experimental, theoretical and numerical investigations on revealing the removal mechanism of different materials, improving the non-uniformity of wafer surface, and optimizing design layouts. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] These investigations demonstrate that understanding the removal mechanism, design pattern effects and thickness variation control is quite helpful for CMP process simulation and optimization of design for manufacturability (DFM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[1][2][3] In order to obtain a planar surface, various kinds of CMP models have been proposed in literature to address the removal mechanism [6][7][8][10][11][12]15 of different materials and achieve accurate surface topography simulation. 1,2,9,13,14,[16][17][18][19][22][23][24] The surface kinetic CMP models connect the total polish rates with kinetic processes and describe the wafer-scale variations of surface profiles. 1,2,6,11,[25][26][27] For the sake of elucidating the mechanical aspects of polishing systems, contact mechanics or fluid dynamics based CMP models have been developed to understand the fundamental phenomena at different length scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36] These waferscale CMP models can be used to capture the surface kinetic effects and relate the MRR to the contact behavior at different polishing conditions. 14,18,[37][38][39][40][41][42] In order to capture the slurry flow behavior in the CMP process, the interaction between the removal rate and the hydrodynamic pressure can also be studied by fluid hydrodynamicsbased models. [43][44][45] Furthermore, mixed lubrication models are developed to analyze CMP process characteristics by using contact mechanics and fluid hydrodynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%