2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feature scale Greenwood–Williamson model predicting pattern-size effects in CMP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Therefore, CMP attracts numerous experimental, theoretical and numerical investigations on revealing the removal mechanism of different materials, improving the non-uniformity of wafer surface, and optimizing design layouts. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] These investigations demonstrate that understanding the removal mechanism, design pattern effects and thickness variation control is quite helpful for CMP process simulation and optimization of design for manufacturability (DFM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Therefore, CMP attracts numerous experimental, theoretical and numerical investigations on revealing the removal mechanism of different materials, improving the non-uniformity of wafer surface, and optimizing design layouts. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] These investigations demonstrate that understanding the removal mechanism, design pattern effects and thickness variation control is quite helpful for CMP process simulation and optimization of design for manufacturability (DFM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[1][2][3] In order to obtain a planar surface, various kinds of CMP models have been proposed in literature to address the removal mechanism [6][7][8][10][11][12]15 of different materials and achieve accurate surface topography simulation. 1,2,9,13,14,[16][17][18][19][22][23][24] The surface kinetic CMP models connect the total polish rates with kinetic processes and describe the wafer-scale variations of surface profiles. 1,2,6,11,[25][26][27] For the sake of elucidating the mechanical aspects of polishing systems, contact mechanics or fluid dynamics based CMP models have been developed to understand the fundamental phenomena at different length scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 80 degrees, it was found that the surface became blunt due to the excessive elevation and the formation of large asperities via the fusion of multiple asperities, as described above. Generally, the contact state of the asperities is closely related to the removal rate in the CMP process [20,21]. is believed to be affected by changes in the asperities' contact states due to the asperity angles, as described in this section, and the experiment was performed to examine this effect.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscope (Sem) and Micro-ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the on-chip pattern has a strong periodicity, this fit is not very complicated with respect to the rough- ness of the polishing pad. So the contact problem becomes a problem between a non-periodic rough surface and periodic point contact [22]. This point contact is specifically divided into two types, one is the top contact (Up), which is for fitting the peak of the parabola; the other is the bottom contact (Down), which is for the valley of the fitting parabola.…”
Section: Model Based On Surface Topography and On-chip Graphics Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%