Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3178876.3186168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feature-Oriented Sentiment Rating for Mobile App Reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Online reviews are the most frequently used type of dynamic data for eliciting requirements (53%), followed by micro-blogs (18%) and online discussions/forums (12%), software repositories Online reviews • Online reviews included app reviews, reviews compiled by experts, and online user reviews. Among the studies which used online reviews, a majority of the studies used app reviews as the sources of potential requirements (75%) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. Of them, 14 used app reviews from multiple distribution platforms such as Apple AppStore and Google Play to increase the level of generalizability, while eleven used those from a single distribution platform, and one did not specify the number of app distribution platforms • Of the studies which used online reviews, 17% (n = 6) extracted user reviews of software and video games [55], IoT products [56], compact cameras [57], internet security [58], Jira and Trello [59], and Jingdong.…”
Section: The Specific Types Of Dynamic Data Used For Automated Requirmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Online reviews are the most frequently used type of dynamic data for eliciting requirements (53%), followed by micro-blogs (18%) and online discussions/forums (12%), software repositories Online reviews • Online reviews included app reviews, reviews compiled by experts, and online user reviews. Among the studies which used online reviews, a majority of the studies used app reviews as the sources of potential requirements (75%) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. Of them, 14 used app reviews from multiple distribution platforms such as Apple AppStore and Google Play to increase the level of generalizability, while eleven used those from a single distribution platform, and one did not specify the number of app distribution platforms • Of the studies which used online reviews, 17% (n = 6) extracted user reviews of software and video games [55], IoT products [56], compact cameras [57], internet security [58], Jira and Trello [59], and Jingdong.…”
Section: The Specific Types Of Dynamic Data Used For Automated Requirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software features [52] and technically informative information from the potential requirements sources [64,86] were summarized, ranked, and visualized using word clouds. Luiz et al [49] summarized overall user evaluation of the mobile applications, their features, and the corresponding user sentiment polarity and scores in a single graphical interface. Oriol et al [89] implemented a quality-aware strategic dashboard, which has various functionalities (e.g., quality assessment, forecasting techniques, and what-if analysis) and allows for maintaining traceability of quality requirements generation and documentation process.…”
Section: Rule-based Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, in paper [6], the author proposed a framework for mobile application developers with which they may be capable of bring in modification on functions the ones are located negative primarily based on the end user's evaluation in their application. Their framework consisted of three main building blocks (i)subject matter modeling, (ii)sentiment analysis and (iii)summarization interface.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feita a coleta, uma etapa fundamental é pré processar esses artigos, removendo caracteres especiais, números e stopwords. Além disso, propomos também a remoção de adjetivos e advérbios, já que os termos mais importantes para identificar um tópico são verbos e substantivos [Luiz et al 2018]. Por fim, restringimos os termos utilizados ao conjunto de palavras do sistema de classificação da ACM, uma vez que pretendemos encontrar tópicos que se relacionem diretamente com áreas de estudo da Ciência da Computação.…”
Section: Etapa 1: Coleta E Representação Dos Dadosunclassified
“…No nosso caso, propomos utilizar a matriz W para abstrair a relação entre termos e tópicos e a matriz H a relação documentos e tópicos. A ideia central por trás do NMF é aproximar as colunas de Z por combinações lineares não negativas dos vetores base (colunas em H) [Luiz et al 2018]. Assim como em vários algoritmos de clustering, a escolha do k (i.e., do número de tópicos) é um problema, pois não existem garantias de encontrar a solução ótima global [Lin 2007].…”
Section: Etapa 2: Modelagem De Tópicosunclassified