2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2007.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feature-based metric for the quantitative evaluation of pixel-level image fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the evaluation of multiple indicators, each fusion method had its own advantages and disadvantages. Among them, the CC shows the degree of change of the image before and after the fusion which is crucial to the accuracy of subsequent treatment [41]. In order to preserve the characteristics of the original image to the maximum extent, we choose the G-S transform with the highest CC as the fusion method of this paper.…”
Section: Multispectral and Panchromatic Image Fusion Results Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the evaluation of multiple indicators, each fusion method had its own advantages and disadvantages. Among them, the CC shows the degree of change of the image before and after the fusion which is crucial to the accuracy of subsequent treatment [41]. In order to preserve the characteristics of the original image to the maximum extent, we choose the G-S transform with the highest CC as the fusion method of this paper.…”
Section: Multispectral and Panchromatic Image Fusion Results Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entropy (NCIE) [52] B. Image Feature Based Metrics Gradient-based fusion Metric (G) [53] Multiscale Image Fusion Metric (M) [54] Spatial Frequency Image Fusion Metric (SF) [55] (we also list as Zheng) Phase Congruency Image Fusion Metric (P) [56,57] (not tested in this paper)…”
Section: (A) Information-theory Based Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the main purpose of this study is to evaluate different fusion methods, while preserving the spectral information provided in the MIs and examine the classification accuracy for different fusion methods. Also, we apply noise-insensitivity approaches for standardizing and automating the evaluation process, based on different assessment methods described by several authors (Gonzalez et al, 2004;Shi et al, 2005;Acerbi et al, 2006;Petrovic, 2007;Nencini et al, 2007;Karathanassi et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2008;Li et al, 2010;Ehler et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%