2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5947-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feasibility Study of Fitting the Normal Distribution and Gamma Distribution to Rainfall Data at Kuantan River Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…maximum likelihood analysis of the daily data sets (Figure 8) revealed that they can be fitted to gamma distributions. Fitting a gamma distribution to daily precipitation values to generate synthetic data has been widely reported in the literature (Coe & Stern, 1982;Ghani et al, 2023;Hasan et al, 2019;Lung, 2016;Martinez-Villalobos & Neelin, 2019). The summary statistics of the daily precipitation values from the simulation and target datasets in the historical period for each month is illustrated in Figure 9.…”
Section: Results Of the Integrated (En-rf) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…maximum likelihood analysis of the daily data sets (Figure 8) revealed that they can be fitted to gamma distributions. Fitting a gamma distribution to daily precipitation values to generate synthetic data has been widely reported in the literature (Coe & Stern, 1982;Ghani et al, 2023;Hasan et al, 2019;Lung, 2016;Martinez-Villalobos & Neelin, 2019). The summary statistics of the daily precipitation values from the simulation and target datasets in the historical period for each month is illustrated in Figure 9.…”
Section: Results Of the Integrated (En-rf) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum likelihood analysis of the daily data sets (Figure 8) revealed that they can be fitted to gamma distributions. Fitting a gamma distribution to daily precipitation values to generate synthetic data has been widely reported in the literature (Coe & Stern, 1982; Ghani et al, 2023; Hasan et al, 2019; Lung, 2016; Martinez‐Villalobos & Neelin, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%