A feasibility study of an unsupervised, pre‐operative exercise program for adults with lung cancer

Finley, David J.; Fay, Kayla A.; Batsis, John A.; Stevens, Caitlin; Sacks, Olivia A.; Darabos, Christian; Cook, Summer B.; Lyons, Kathleen Doyle

doi:10.1111/ecc.13254

Cited by 23 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results are in line with what was reported in a recent literature review which showed a high-level adherence in long term daily use [ 32 ]. The acceptance rate in our study was high compared to other studies using the same device [ 33 ]. Our results considered a longer follow up period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results

Ocagli

Lorenzoni

Lanera

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wearable devices (WDs) can objectively assess patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in clinical trials. In this study, the feasibility and acceptability of using commercial WDs in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) will be explored. This is a prospective observational study. Participants were trained to use a WD and a smartphone to collect data on their physical activity, rest heart rate and number of hours of sleep. Validated questionnaires were also used to evaluate these outcomes. A technology acceptance questionnaire was used at the end of the follow up. In our participants an overall good compliance in wearing the device (75.1% vs. 79.8%, SAVR vs. TAVR) was assessed. Half of the patients were willing to continue using the device. Perceived ease of use is one of the domains that scored higher in the technology acceptance questionnaire. In this study we observed that the use of a WD is accepted in our frail population for an extended period. Even though commercial WDs are not tailored for clinical research, they can produce useful information on patient behavior, especially when coordinated with intervention tailored to the single patient.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results

Ocagli

Lorenzoni

Lanera

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To measure PA as an outcome, accelerometers were the primary device used in 46% of the original studies. Of the remaining studies, 4% used pedometers and 41% used a combination of self-monitoring devices to assess changes in PA, including Fitbit [ 45 , 46 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 59 , 63 , 65 , 66 , 68 , 71 ], Neofit [ 58 ], Garmin Vivofit [ 60 , 61 ], Xiaomi wristband [ 70 ], treadmill and heart rate monitors [ 44 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 58 , 69 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The perceived acceptability was manifested by positive results in satisfaction [ 46 , 65 ] and compliance [ 57 , 58 ] rates. The majority of participants were willing to spend time installing the relevant software [ 49 ] and to continue using the wearable devices after the intervention ended [ 58 ]. Accordingly, several studies reported that feedback was particularly beneficial for increasing PA, with the majority of research participants reporting that text messages and self-monitoring data had a motivating effect [ 51 , 68 , 71 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Wearable Activity-Monitoring Technologies to Promote Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Opportunities for Improved Cancer Care

Keats

Magee

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this review was to explore the acceptability, opportunities, and challenges associated with wearable activity-monitoring technology to increase physical activity (PA) behavior in cancer survivors. A search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and SportDiscus was conducted from 1 January 2011 through 3 October 2022. The search was limited to English language, and peer-reviewed original research. Studies were included if they reported the use of an activity monitor in adults (+18 years) with a history of cancer with the intent to motivate PA behavior. Our search identified 1832 published articles, of which 28 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eighteen of these studies included post-treatment cancer survivors, eight were on active cancer treatment, and two were long-term cancer survivor studies. ActiGraph accelerometers were the primary technology used to monitor PA behaviors, with Fitbit as the most commonly utilized self-monitoring wearable technology. Overall, wearable activity monitors were found to be an acceptable and useful tool in improving self-awareness, motivating behavioral change, and increasing PA levels. Self-monitoring wearable activity devices have a positive impact on short-term PA behaviors in cancer survivors, but the increase in PA gradually attenuated through the maintenance phase. Further study is needed to evaluate and increase the sustainability of the use of wearable technologies to support PA in cancer survivors.

show abstract

“…30 This approach extends beyond oncologic surgery into cardiac and lung surgery where functional recovery has been assessed in the context of the trajectory of steps in the perioperative period. 31,32 This study has helped lay the foundation for expectations as work done in accelerometer-based physical activity in older cancer patients demonstrates that only 41% returned to baseline levels within 3 months. 33 The data presented above encompass the quality of recovery in surgery that must take into account the patients perceptions Ultimately, the goals are to take the data generated and analyze it to serves patients, clinicians, and health systems in a meaningful way.…”

Section: Pghd In Surgical Oncologymentioning

confidence: 95%

“…This approach extends beyond oncologic surgery into cardiac and lung surgery where functional recovery has been assessed in the context of the trajectory of steps in the perioperative period 31,32 . This study has helped lay the foundation for expectations as work done in accelerometer‐based physical activity in older cancer patients demonstrates that only 41% returned to baseline levels within 3 months 33 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient generated health data and electronic health record integration in oncologic surgery: A call for artificial intelligence and machine learning

Melstrom

Rodin

Rossi

et al. 2020

Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this review, we aim to assess the current state of science in relation to the integration of patient-generated health data (PGHD) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into routine clinical care with a focus on surgical oncology populations. We will also describe the critical role of artificial intelligence and machine-learning methodology in the efficient translation of PGHD, PROs, and traditional outcome measures into meaningful patient care models.

show abstract

A feasibility study of an unsupervised, pre‐operative exercise program for adults with lung cancer

Cited by 23 publications

References 30 publications

Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results

Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results

Use of Wearable Activity-Monitoring Technologies to Promote Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Opportunities for Improved Cancer Care

Patient generated health data and electronic health record integration in oncologic surgery: A call for artificial intelligence and machine learning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About