2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feasibility evaluation on the outsourcing of quality testing and inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies on outsourcing have been reported in recent years, mainly covering issues of product quality (Arya et al 2008, Choi et al 2009, Ni et al 2009) manufacturing flexibility (Kaya 2011), product unit cost (Tsai andLai 2007, Ni et al 2009) and delivery schedules (Lee andSung 2008, Choi andChung 2011). In contrast, our paper shifts the focus towards finding suitable suppliers with the objective of adequately protecting a company's crucial product/process knowledge.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Numerous studies on outsourcing have been reported in recent years, mainly covering issues of product quality (Arya et al 2008, Choi et al 2009, Ni et al 2009) manufacturing flexibility (Kaya 2011), product unit cost (Tsai andLai 2007, Ni et al 2009) and delivery schedules (Lee andSung 2008, Choi andChung 2011). In contrast, our paper shifts the focus towards finding suitable suppliers with the objective of adequately protecting a company's crucial product/process knowledge.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Integrated with linguistic processing. Choi et al(2009) Evaluated the feasibility of outsourcing testing and inspection activities in construction work.…”
Section: Further Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the testing activities has been completed, the testing outcomes are evaluated through quality assessment in order to determine whether or not the project objectives are met [32]. The client has the right to reject the outcomes, particularly if they do not meet the stipulated criteria or expectation.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%