2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47867-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Faster Scaling Algorithm for Minimizing Submodular Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combinatorial strongly polynomial algorithms for minimizing submodular functions were developed later by Iwata, Fleischer, and Fujishige [15] and by Schrijver [26]. These combinatorial algorithms have been improved in time complexity [14,16,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinatorial strongly polynomial algorithms for minimizing submodular functions were developed later by Iwata, Fleischer, and Fujishige [15] and by Schrijver [26]. These combinatorial algorithms have been improved in time complexity [14,16,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submodular function maximization is easily shown to be NPhard [34] since it generalizes many standard NP-hard problems such as the maximum cut problem [12,9]. In contrast, the problem of minimizing a submodular function can be solved efficiently with only polynomially many evaluations of the function [19] either by using the ellipsoid algorithm [13,14], or by using one of several combinatorial algorithms that have been obtained in the last decade [33,20,17,18,30,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submodular function maximisation is easily shown to be NPhard [47] since it generalises many standard NP-hard problems such as the maximum cut problem. In contrast, the problem of minimising a submodular function (SFM) can be solved efficiently with only polynomially many oracle calls, either by using the ellipsoid algorithm [20,21], or by using one of several combinatorial algorithms that have been obtained in the last decade [46,26,24,25,40,28]. The time complexity of the fastest known general algorithm for SFM is O(n 6 + n 5 L), where n is the number of variables and L is the time required to evaluate the function [40].…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%