2007
DOI: 10.1145/1239451.1239551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast variational framework for accurate solid-fluid coupling

Abstract: Physical simulation has emerged as a compelling animation technique, yet current approaches to coupling simulations of fluids and solids with irregular boundary geometry are inefficient or cannot handle some relevant scenarios robustly. We propose a new variational approach which allows robust and accurate solution on relatively coarse Cartesian grids, allowing possibly orders of magnitude faster simulation. By rephrasing the classical pressure projection step as a kinetic energy minimization, broadly similar … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
131
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This naturally enforces the no-penetration and no-separation boundary condition (up to numerical errors). Note that while this is physically correct, when the boundary layer is under-resolved, as may happen in large-scale simulations, reverting to freely separating boundary conditions by disallowing negative pressures may provide more plausible results [Batty et al 2007;Chentanez and Müller 2011].…”
Section: Ghost Particles In the Solidmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This naturally enforces the no-penetration and no-separation boundary condition (up to numerical errors). Note that while this is physically correct, when the boundary layer is under-resolved, as may happen in large-scale simulations, reverting to freely separating boundary conditions by disallowing negative pressures may provide more plausible results [Batty et al 2007;Chentanez and Müller 2011].…”
Section: Ghost Particles In the Solidmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The transition from gird to particles are handled by sharp transition as shown in Equation (5). The reader are suggested to refer to reference [3] for more detailed discussion.…”
Section: Nbflip Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu [4] introduced the FLIP and PIC (Particle in Cell) methods into the computer graphics community in sand simulation, in which the sticky effect of sand flow was reproduced successfully. Batty [5] proposed a fluid-solid coupling method based on variational principles and solved problems on interaction with slim obstacles. Cornelis [6] and Zhu [7] combined FLIP method with Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method for incompressible fluid simulation with an expectation of getting more details.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guendelman et al [13] use a similar object velocity/fluid pressure coupling to animate the interaction of incompressible fluids with zero volume deformable and rigid shells. [3], [15]- [17] solve simultaneosly for the fluid pressure and solid velocity to obtain a fully implicit two-way solid-fluid coupling. We chose to use the Rigid Fluid method from Carlson et al [9] to model our rigid bodies interacting with incompressible fluid.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations the object does not cause any changes to the water. Only recently have we seen animations where the motion of the object affects the fluid and vice-versa [3], [9], [12]- [17]. We use a full two-way solid-fluid coupling enabling us to demonstrate effects that were not viable before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%