2015
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2014.2387377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Rendezvous-Guarantee Channel Hopping Protocol for Cognitive Radio Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many CH-based rendezvous schemes have been proposed in the literature. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] These schemes can be categorized in different ways, according to the adopted assumptions and mathematical construction tools. A detailed survey of the rendezvous issue in cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHNs) and the different categories of the CH-based rendezvous schemes is well studied in the work of Joshi et al 24 However, most of the existing CH rendezvous designs were not tailored for fast PU dynamics, where channel availabilities can vary during the rendezvous operation itself.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many CH-based rendezvous schemes have been proposed in the literature. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] These schemes can be categorized in different ways, according to the adopted assumptions and mathematical construction tools. A detailed survey of the rendezvous issue in cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHNs) and the different categories of the CH-based rendezvous schemes is well studied in the work of Joshi et al 24 However, most of the existing CH rendezvous designs were not tailored for fast PU dynamics, where channel availabilities can vary during the rendezvous operation itself.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rendezvous occurs between a pair of communicating SUs when they hop during the same time slot over a channel that is commonly available for both of them. Many CH‐based rendezvous schemes have been proposed in the literature . These schemes can be categorized in different ways, according to the adopted assumptions and mathematical construction tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that SU A and SU B are equipped with an equal number of radios within the range of [1,3]. Fig.…”
Section: B Pairwise Multiradio Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i) Asynchronous local clock. Synchronous algorithms (e.g., CACH [2] and QLCH [3]) assume that SUs are in-sync with each other. However, due to the difficulty in achieving clock synchronization between spatially dispersed SUs, it is thus necessary to support the asynchronous scenario for the rendezvous schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the SH schemes in [19,28] are designed only for asymmetric-role environment, where SUs have preassigned role (i.e., SU is either a sender or receiver). However, this design limits the applications of the schemes; for example, SUs cannot work as a forwarder (i.e., receive packets from one SU and then forward them to another SU) due to the permanent role assignment [29]. Another drawback of these works is their limitations to provide a complete solution for combining the SH scheme with a suitable and efficient CH scheme which consider the unique traits of DIR-CRNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%