2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast method to predict protein interaction sites from sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
155
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results highlight the importance of this conserved Arg in protein interaction. It was reported that in a high throughput statistical analysis of amino acid frequencies involved in protein interaction, the arginine is the most frequent residue because of its wider radii of action and more accessible long side chains carrying the charge (59). So the Arg to His mutation may change the favorable amino acid feature for protein interaction or alter the protein structure, resulting in failure of interaction with partners.…”
Section: C-e;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results highlight the importance of this conserved Arg in protein interaction. It was reported that in a high throughput statistical analysis of amino acid frequencies involved in protein interaction, the arginine is the most frequent residue because of its wider radii of action and more accessible long side chains carrying the charge (59). So the Arg to His mutation may change the favorable amino acid feature for protein interaction or alter the protein structure, resulting in failure of interaction with partners.…”
Section: C-e;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important factor influencing the accuracy of interaction predictions is the proper representation of the proteins. There are two classes of input data used in most theoretical methods: sequence profiles (phylogenetic profiles [63], mRNA expression levels [64], the presence of protein domains in analyzed sequences [65], and other approaches [66][67][68]); and three-dimensional structures of interacting partners (prediction methods tested every year in independent computational experiments in the Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions, CAPRI [57], methods based on the features of protein surfaces that allow for typing of the protein complexes [58,[69][70][71], the selection of the most important residues and their features on protein interfaces [59,[72][73][74], and other representations of experimental data [6,[75][76][77]). If the complex structure is known, it is possible to select interacting interfaces on the protein surfaces, find the most important residues, and analyze their evolutionary conservation or physico-chemical features [6,58,78,79].…”
Section: Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include methods based on presence of "proline brackets'' (Kini and Evans, 1996), patch analysis using a 6-parameter scoring function Thornton 1997a, 1997b), analysis of hydrophobicity distribution around a target residue (Gallet et al, 2000), multiple sequence alignment (Casarai et al, 1995;Lichtarge et al, 1996;Pazos et al, 1997), structure-based multimeric threading (Lu et al, 2002), analysis of amino acid characteristics of spatial neighbors of a target residue using a neural network (Zhou and Shan,2001;Fariselli et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%