2006
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2006.1706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast method for nonlinear three-dimensional free-surface waves

Abstract: An efficient numerical model for solving fully nonlinear potential flow equations with a free surface is presented. Like the code that was developed by Grilli et al . (Grilli et al . 2001 Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 35 , 829–867), it uses a high-order three-dimensional boundary-element method combined with mixed Eulerian–Lagrangian time updating, based on second-order explicit Taylor expansions with adaptive time-steps. Such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, progress in both mathematical techniques and computer power has led to a rapid development of numerical models solving the full Euler equations. These can be divided into two main categories: boundary integral methods [2,24,49,7,20,27] and spectral methods. In particular, efficient spectral methods based on perturbation expansions have been developed for the computation of water waves on constant or…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, progress in both mathematical techniques and computer power has led to a rapid development of numerical models solving the full Euler equations. These can be divided into two main categories: boundary integral methods [2,24,49,7,20,27] and spectral methods. In particular, efficient spectral methods based on perturbation expansions have been developed for the computation of water waves on constant or…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As could be seen from the table, the QALE-FEM takes only 0.91h (or 54 minutes) to produce the results with acceptable errors in mass and energy (ε m = 0.1% and ε e = 0.26%, respectively). Even to achieve higher accuracy of ε m = 0.09% and ε e = 0.16% , which are smaller than those errors given by Fochesato & Dias [55], the CPU time taken by the QALE-FEM is only 1.8h (or 108 minutes). Therefore, for this particular case, the QALE-FEM can be at least 10 times faster than the fast BEM method.…”
Section: Computational Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The fast BEM method has successfully modelled 3D overturning solitary waves [55] and freak waves [56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations