2019
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Likelihood Method to Reconstruct and Visualize Ancestral Scenarios

Abstract: The reconstruction of ancestral scenarios is widely used to study the evolution of characters along phylogenetic trees. One commonly uses the marginal posterior probabilities of the character states, or the joint reconstruction of the most likely scenario. However, marginal reconstructions provide users with state probabilities, which are difficult to interpret and visualize, whereas joint reconstructions select a unique state for every tree node and thus do not reflect the uncertainty of inferences. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
170
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform the ancestral character state reconstructions by ML we used two recently published programs: PastView [56,57] and PastML [58,59]. Both methods are based on a F81-like marginal posteriors inference [60] with an optimized scaling factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To perform the ancestral character state reconstructions by ML we used two recently published programs: PastView [56,57] and PastML [58,59]. Both methods are based on a F81-like marginal posteriors inference [60] with an optimized scaling factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were performed on the rooted phylogenetic tree previously computed by PhyML, with annotated tips (geographical origin of each isolate). The specificity of the PastML method is the use of a decision-theory concept and a Brier criterion to predict a unique state if the node is associated with low uncertainty, or several state if this uncertainty is high [59]. Reconstructions were performed as recommended by the authors (marginal posterior probabilities approximation (MPPA) under a F81-like model).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it enables accurate testing of popular inference methods in both discrete and continuous phylogeography using either maximum-likelihood (Ishikawa, Zhukova, Iwasaki, & Gascuel, 2019) or Bayesian inference (Lemey, Rambaut, Drummond, & Suchard, 2009;Lemey et al, 2010;Suchard et al, 2018), which are widely used in pathogen phylodynamics. In that regard, an interesting application of our proposed simulation framework could be to study the increasingly popular structured coalescent models nosoi enables the simulation of real-life scenarios of viral outbreaks, and we provide several example scenarios to showcase its capabilities to generate a single transmission chain using different settings.…”
Section: Us E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best fitting model was assessed using the AIC (Glick and Mayrose, 2014). Furthermore, the ancestral states of chromosome number along the branches were estimated using PastML (Ishikawa et al, 2019) applying two prediction methods, Maximum Likelihood (JOINT+F81) and Maximum Parsimony (Accelerated Transformation), respectively. Since these analyses can take only one state per sample, only the lowest chromosome number for each species was used in the case of samples with more than one cytotype, with different chromosome numbers and ploidy levels.…”
Section: Ancestral Chromosome Number Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…number reconstruction based on the phylogenetic tree with PastML ( Figure 7) and ChromEvol (Supplementary data 12). Based on the ancestral character reconstruction with PastML (Ishikawa et al, 2019) karyotypes with n = 5 or 10 were the most likely ancestral complement, based on maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP), respectively (Figure 7). The ChromEvol model reported an ACN of n = 5 and variations were mostly attributed to polyploidization (1.39), chromosome fusion (1.13) and less frequently to fission (0.76) (Supplementary data 12 shows much more support for n = 5), according to the optimal model selected by means of the Akaike information Criterion (AIC) (Akaike, 1974).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships and Ancestral Chromosome Number (mentioning
confidence: 99%