2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and simple method to monitor carbonation of MSWI bottom ash under static and dynamic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a considerable amount of residual material is still generated after the incineration process: typically MSW incineration fly ash (MSWI-FA) and MSW incineration bottom ash (MSWI-BA) [4,5]. MSWI-BA accounts for nearly 80% of the total residual by mass and is complex, consisting of combustion residue and non-combustible constituents of the waste feed [6][7][8]. In Europe and Asia, MSWI-BA is often classified as non-hazardous waste [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a considerable amount of residual material is still generated after the incineration process: typically MSW incineration fly ash (MSWI-FA) and MSW incineration bottom ash (MSWI-BA) [4,5]. MSWI-BA accounts for nearly 80% of the total residual by mass and is complex, consisting of combustion residue and non-combustible constituents of the waste feed [6][7][8]. In Europe and Asia, MSWI-BA is often classified as non-hazardous waste [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lombardi et al ( 2016) compared two reactor designs for CO 2 sequestration from flue gas by BA and confirmed this assumption. Similar results were obtained by Brück et al (2018). Continuously operated rotating drums are used in a series of industrial applications to provide the solid's motion (Sherritt et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The reactor was instrumented with a piezoresistive pressure sensor (OxiTop, WTW, Weilheim, Germany) with a tolerance of ± 1 hPa to record the pressure drop induced by CO 2 uptake and with wireless temperature/humidity sensors (AREXX TSN‐TH70E, RS Zwolle, The Netherlands) with tolerances of ± 1 °C and ± 0.5% relative humidity. Modifying a similar set‐up used by Brück et al ., 27 the system was equipped with a solenoid valve‐controlled CO 2 supply attached to a gas cylinder (CO 2 , N4.5). By automated opening and closing of the valve the reactor was held at atmospheric pressure ± 7.5 kPa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to carbonation, leak tests were performed at −15 kPa and +15 kPa relative to atmosphere while monitoring pressure constancy for at least 30 min. Reactor preparation also involved several purging steps as described by Brück et al 27 . During the purging and before sealing, the CO 2 concentration reached the target, but no pressure measurement was possible for approximately 2 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation