2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and robust method for whole genome sequencing of the Aleutian Mink Disease Virus (AMDV) genome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitation of the interpretation of the partial NS1 data could be avoided in future studies by using next generation sequencing (NGS) of the full genome. This method would allow for trace of the transmission of the virus between farms and to draw more valid conclusion using the full genome sequencing compared to the partial NS1 [28]. Furthermore, NGS would ease the identification of herds infected with more than one strain as previously reported [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of the interpretation of the partial NS1 data could be avoided in future studies by using next generation sequencing (NGS) of the full genome. This method would allow for trace of the transmission of the virus between farms and to draw more valid conclusion using the full genome sequencing compared to the partial NS1 [28]. Furthermore, NGS would ease the identification of herds infected with more than one strain as previously reported [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the issue of limited resolution of the phylogeny, a drawback with different partial sequences is that they sometimes result in different and conflicting tree topologies [ 17 , 19 ]. It has however been shown that by sequencing the entire AMDV genome the phylogenetic resolution is increased to a level where transmission routes between farms can be elucidated [ 24 , 25 ], however the costs associated with the next generation sequencing (NGS) approach are substantial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%