2020
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and robust iterative genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy

Abstract: The production of optimized strains of a specific phenotype requires the construction and testing of a large number of genome modifications and combinations thereof. Most bacterial iterative genome-editing methods include essential steps to eliminate selection markers, or to cure plasmids. Additionally, the presence of escapers leads to time-consuming separate single clone picking and subsequent cultivation steps. Herein, we report a genome-editing method based on a Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) strategy. Each of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This entire process was completed in 8 days. In comparison, using the mature CRISPR-Cas9 system to edit 14 sites, according to the latest reported iterative genome-editing method 15 to edit one site every round, requires 28 days in total, which is 3.5 times of that taken by MUCICAT. Futhermore, the workload was greatly reduced using MUCICAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This entire process was completed in 8 days. In comparison, using the mature CRISPR-Cas9 system to edit 14 sites, according to the latest reported iterative genome-editing method 15 to edit one site every round, requires 28 days in total, which is 3.5 times of that taken by MUCICAT. Futhermore, the workload was greatly reduced using MUCICAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 In Escherichia coli, at least 2 days were needed for one copy of chromosomal integration. 15 Alternatively, the bacteriophage Mu-driven transposition system, in principle, allows for the integration/amplification of target genes in the chromosomes, but the integration sites are random. 16 Recently discovered transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems, including I-F3 and V-K subtypes, [17][18][19] enable genomic site-specific DNA integration without introducing DSB, which means they are independent of HR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first constructed the genome integration strain GF-5 (Additional file 1 : Table S2), which is a counterpart of GF-1. In brief, taking advantage of a fast and robust iterative genome-editing CRISPR/Cas9 system based on the Rock-Paper-Scissors strategy [ 35 ], the gene encoding RrUGT3 was successfully integrated into the genome of E. coli BL21(DE3) at the ushA gene locus (in-frame deletion), knockout of which was reported to increase the supply of UDPG [ 15 ]. Upon feeding of 1 , GF-5 exhibited a similar activity (yield 99.8%) as the corresponding plasmid-based strain GF-1 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRISPR/Cas9 technology was adopted for E. coli genome editing, which was carried out based on the reports of Li et al [ 68 ] and Wang et al [ 35 ] with some modifications. The ushA gene was chosen as a locus for heterogeneous gene integration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative genome editing (IGE) requires to efficiently cure the genome editing plasmid, and targeting replicons or resistance genes of the plasmid using a gRNA has been employed for this purpose [14,[16][17][18][19]. In this study, we constructed an all-in-one plasmid that utilizes CRISPR-Cas9 system for IGE in B. subtilis.…”
Section: Design and Construction Of An All-in-one Plasmid Crispr-cas9...mentioning
confidence: 99%