2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and efficient gene-network reconstruction method from multiple over-expression experiments

Abstract: BackgroundReverse engineering of gene regulatory networks presents one of the big challenges in systems biology. Gene regulatory networks are usually inferred from a set of single-gene over-expressions and/or knockout experiments. Functional relationships between genes are retrieved either from the steady state gene expressions or from respective time series.ResultsWe present a novel algorithm for gene network reconstruction on the basis of steady-state gene-chip data from over-expression experiments. The algo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topology of the predicted network often determines the type of the best method. This is one reason, why combination of various methods (or the use of iterative approaches) may outperform individual methodologies (Liang et al, 1998a; Akutsu et al, 1999; Ideker et al, 2000; Kholodenko et al, 2002; Yeung et al, 2002; Segal et al, 2003; Tegnér et al, 2003; Friedman, 2004; Tegnér & Björkegren, 2007; Cosgrove et al, 2008; Kim et al, 2008; Ahmed & Xing, 2009; Stokić et al, 2009; Marbach et al, 2010; Yip et al, 2010; Pham et al, 2011; Schaffter et al, 2011; Altay, 2012; Crombach et al, 2012; Kotera et al, 2012; Marbach et al, 2012). Jurman et al (2012a) designed a network sampling stability-based tool to assess network reconstruction performance.…”
Section: An Inventory Of Network Analysis Tools Helping Drug Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topology of the predicted network often determines the type of the best method. This is one reason, why combination of various methods (or the use of iterative approaches) may outperform individual methodologies (Liang et al, 1998a; Akutsu et al, 1999; Ideker et al, 2000; Kholodenko et al, 2002; Yeung et al, 2002; Segal et al, 2003; Tegnér et al, 2003; Friedman, 2004; Tegnér & Björkegren, 2007; Cosgrove et al, 2008; Kim et al, 2008; Ahmed & Xing, 2009; Stokić et al, 2009; Marbach et al, 2010; Yip et al, 2010; Pham et al, 2011; Schaffter et al, 2011; Altay, 2012; Crombach et al, 2012; Kotera et al, 2012; Marbach et al, 2012). Jurman et al (2012a) designed a network sampling stability-based tool to assess network reconstruction performance.…”
Section: An Inventory Of Network Analysis Tools Helping Drug Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For various reasons, linearized autocatalytic networks have been considered, for the case of abundant substrate (e.g. Jain & Krishna 1998, or for reverse engineering (Yeung et al 2002;Stokić et al 2009). Systems with linearized dynamics can be easily depicted in terms of directed reaction networks, where nodes represent molecular species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them can be directly applied to gene perturbation screens, even though some of them have been introduced in different contexts. While this review has focused on single gene knock-outs and knock-downs, similar approaches can be applied to gene over-expression screens [22] , [83] , [93] , [94] , drug treatment [84] , environmental stresses changing many genes [95] , [96] , or even natural genetic variation [97] .…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%