2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast algorithm for the estimation of statistical error in DNS (or experimental) time averages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling errors for some key properties discussed in this paper have been estimated using the method of Russo & Luchini (2017), based on an extension of the classical batch means approach. The results of the uncertainty estimation analysis are listed in table 2, where we provide expected values and associated standard deviation for the friction factor (), mean centreline velocity (), peak axial velocity variance and its position ( and , respectively), and the dissipation rate of axial velocity variance ().…”
Section: The Numerical Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling errors for some key properties discussed in this paper have been estimated using the method of Russo & Luchini (2017), based on an extension of the classical batch means approach. The results of the uncertainty estimation analysis are listed in table 2, where we provide expected values and associated standard deviation for the friction factor (), mean centreline velocity (), peak axial velocity variance and its position ( and , respectively), and the dissipation rate of axial velocity variance ().…”
Section: The Numerical Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upper 95% CI Lower 95% CI [ u ] Accurate quantification of the uncertainties due to finite time-averaging using methods similar to those investigated in [57,44,71] will be considered in the feature.…”
Section: Mean Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as in the previous work of [28], the amplitude ε of the wall oscillation has to strike a compromise between linearity and statistical fluctuation error of time averaging, which had to be found by trial and error. For this purpose a new algorithm was developed [36] in order to estimate the expected error of the time average. Re = 1450 (Re = 100); computational box up to 8π.…”
Section: Immersed-boundary Direct Numerical Simulation Of Turbulent Flow Past a Wavy Bottommentioning
confidence: 99%