2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-019-0563-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A farm-level assessment of labor and mechanization in Eastern and Southern Africa

Abstract: Once again, agricultural mechanization is top on the policy, research, and development agendas in sub-Saharan Africa. However, whether labor is limiting in this region-and mechanization is in demand-remains debated. The hypothesis of this study is that labor is a major limiting factor to the productivity of most farming systems in Africa. We used farm-level data (including detailed labor data) from eight sites dominated by smallholder agriculture and spanning four countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One concern is that the expansion of cropland, led by mechanized land preparation, may increase labour burden for activities that are not yet mechanized, such as weeding and harvesting, which are often carried out by women and children. Using qualitative techniques, Baudron et al (2019) found that mechanization of land preparation benefits both men and women. , using a picture-based smartphone application to collect detailed time-use data, suggested that mechanization reduces women's workload during land preparation and weeding as mechanized tillage suppresses weed growth and because households use animals and herbicides for weeding.…”
Section: Myth or Reality? Mechanization Benefits Mostly Men (Mixed Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One concern is that the expansion of cropland, led by mechanized land preparation, may increase labour burden for activities that are not yet mechanized, such as weeding and harvesting, which are often carried out by women and children. Using qualitative techniques, Baudron et al (2019) found that mechanization of land preparation benefits both men and women. , using a picture-based smartphone application to collect detailed time-use data, suggested that mechanization reduces women's workload during land preparation and weeding as mechanized tillage suppresses weed growth and because households use animals and herbicides for weeding.…”
Section: Myth or Reality? Mechanization Benefits Mostly Men (Mixed Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, different studies come to different conclusions. Using data from eight study sites across four Eastern and Southern African countries, Baudron et al (2019) found that a lack of draught or tractor power limits land productivity. Using propensity score matching, Adu-Baffour et al (2019) found that mechanized households have a 25% higher yield compared to non-mechanized households, possibly due to the combined effects of better and timelier land preparation as well as the use of complementary inputs.…”
Section: Myth or Reality? Mechanization Only Saves Labour (Not Generamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the mechanization of land preparation, harvesting and threshing can be useful in areas with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS, for female-headed households, where manual work is too expensive, or where the so-called "window for seeding and planting" is very narrow (Baudron et al, 2015;Baudron et al, 2019). Baudron et al indicated "that farm power in East and Southern African countries is declining due to the collapse of most tractor hire schemes, the decline in number of draught animals and the growing shortage of human labour" and insist that "a consequence of low levels of farm mechanization is high labour drudgery, which makes farming unattractive to the youth and disproportionally affects women".…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanization is unfolding rapidly in Asia (Wang et al 2016) and is increasingly promoted in Africa Birner 2020, 2017;Benin 2015;Diao et al 2014). Some studies have looked at the gender aspects of agricultural mechanization (Baudron et al 2019;Eerdewijk and Danielsen 2015;Fischer et al 2018). Eerdewijk and Danielsen (2015), for example, find that women have limited voice over mechanization adoption decisions, which makes it more likely that households invest in and adopt technologies that save men's time (see also Doss 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%