AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-3220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A family of universal miniature autopilots - design solutions, characteristics, hardware/software-in-the-loop simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hardware in the loop simulations were realized for the system verification (Kopecki, 2016; Kopecki, 2018). For simulations, nonlinear aircraft model designed with the use of X-Plane was used, implemented in PC AC dynamics simulation and visualization computer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardware in the loop simulations were realized for the system verification (Kopecki, 2016; Kopecki, 2018). For simulations, nonlinear aircraft model designed with the use of X-Plane was used, implemented in PC AC dynamics simulation and visualization computer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results made available in this article constitute preliminary work and can be developed in several directions. A further objective is to implement a designed control system in a missile using different autopilot systems and put it to tests in a real environment [8,9] and different missile configurations [10]. Another task is implementation of different control algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another task is implementation of different control algorithms. The presented stand can also be used for hardware in loop simulation [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, some categories of flight tests have limited application in ultra-light (UL) and remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS) systems because of weight limitations and the complexity of data collection systems (Bakunowicz and Meyer, 2016; Blachuta et al , 2014; Brzozowski et al , 2017; Majka, 2014; Nowak et al , 2014; Kopecki and Rzucidlo, 2016). Another challenge is the flexibility of systems in terms of signal redundancy, multiple measurement points (Krichen et al , 2017), capability and integration issues (Chudy et al , 2013; Kopecki et al , 2016; Majka, 2017). Moreover, flight test costs are increased by the necessity of complex processing and interpretation of collected data, as well as limitations driven by regulations (Szewczyk et al , 2017; Rzucidlo et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%