“…1.At the core of this debate is the question: “if ethnographers are committed to the representation of local perspectives of participants (i.e., the proverbial “native point of view”), in what ways and to what extent are they permitted to interweave critical commentaries into their analyses?” For articles that participated in the debate directly, see, Carbaugh (1989a, 1991); Fiske (1990); Philipsen (1989, 1991, 2010); Philipsen et al (2005). For other related discussions see, for example, Carbaugh et al (2011); Coutu (1994); Flanigan (2011); Gershenson (2003); Lie and Sandel (2020); Sotirova (2018).…”