2013
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A family of null models to distinguish between environmental filtering and biotic interactions in functional diversity patterns

Abstract: We argue that the traditional null model approach can only identify a single main process at a time and suggest to rather use a family of null models to disentangle intertwined assembly processes acting across spatial and evolutionary scales.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare observed functional diversity with that of random assemblages, to assess how functional diversity varies between our focal assemblages when taking into account differences in their species richness. The spatial definition of the pool of species on which null models are based can strongly determine conclusions regarding community assembly processes (Chalmandrier et al, 2013;Herben et al, 2013). Therefore, we constructed a specific trait matrix for the regional pool of species occurring within each of our main bio-regions (the Western Palearctic, North America and South America).…”
Section: Functional Diversity Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare observed functional diversity with that of random assemblages, to assess how functional diversity varies between our focal assemblages when taking into account differences in their species richness. The spatial definition of the pool of species on which null models are based can strongly determine conclusions regarding community assembly processes (Chalmandrier et al, 2013;Herben et al, 2013). Therefore, we constructed a specific trait matrix for the regional pool of species occurring within each of our main bio-regions (the Western Palearctic, North America and South America).…”
Section: Functional Diversity Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional evenness and dispersion are independent from species richness, which allows comparison of quadrats and ontogenetic stages with different species richness without bias, and their independence from functional richness allows for testing of differences in functional evenness or dispersion with different functional richness values (laliberte and legendre 2010; Villeger et al 2008). Co-occurring species tend to be functionally convergent under strong environmental filtering (Chalmandrier et al 2013;Cornwell et al 2006;spasojevic and suding 2012). We expected that functional similarity would increase from saplings to large trees.…”
Section: Functional Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including information on absent species has improved our understanding of community assembly (de Bello et al., 2012; Chalmandrier et al., 2013) and can improve predictions of which species will establish. The accuracy of such predictions, however, is highly dependent on how dissimilarity is measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires gathering data on both regional and local diversity and identifying an appropriate habitat‐specific species pool, as in null modeling approaches (de Bello et al., 2012; Chalmandrier et al., 2013; Lessard et al., 2016). Diversity at these three scales must then be combined with information on species’ functional traits or phylogenetic relationships.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%