2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.124822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A family of Craig–Bampton methods considering residual mode compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We here compare the IF‐CMS method with the other well‐known iterative CMS methods: Higher‐order CB (HCB) method 30,35 and iterative CB method 31 . Both the HCB and iterative CB methods were directly motivated from the ECB method that is the first CB approach with the residual flexibility 19 .…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We here compare the IF‐CMS method with the other well‐known iterative CMS methods: Higher‐order CB (HCB) method 30,35 and iterative CB method 31 . Both the HCB and iterative CB methods were directly motivated from the ECB method that is the first CB approach with the residual flexibility 19 .…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition numbers of the reduced matrices become worse through the iteration process. The HCB method and other related methods simply handled this issue with higher precisions such as 32 or 64 digits, 30,35 but the IF‐CMS formulation resolves it by using the preconditioning process within the standard 16 digit precision.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations