2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4982-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A family of charged compact objects with anisotropic pressure

Abstract: Utilizing an ansatz developed by Maurya et al. we present a class of exact solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell field equations describing a spherically symmetric compact object. A detailed physical analysis of these solutions in terms of stability, compactness and regularity indicates that these solutions may be used to model strange star candidates. In particular, we model the strange star candidate Her X-1 and show that our solution conforms to observational data to an excellent degree of accuracy. An interest… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This feature indicates that the parameter n can be Table 2 Comparison between estimated and observed values of mass and radius for different compact stars [36] Compact star Table 3 Numerical data of AR 2 corresponding to observed mass and radius with reference to Table 1 for different values of n Compact stars n = −6.5 n = −10 n = −50 n = −500 n = −5000 n = −50,000 Table 4 Numerical data of AR 2 corresponding to observed mass and radius with reference to Table 1 for different values of n Compact stars n = −45 n = −100 n = −1000 n = −10,000 n = −100,000 viewed as a 'building' constant, that is to say, an increase in n is accompanied by an increase in mass, radius and charge which builds up the star from r = 0 through to the surface. In this work we have utilised n < 0 and the case n ≥ 0 was studied by [34]. Future work has been initiated to consider the case of general n.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature indicates that the parameter n can be Table 2 Comparison between estimated and observed values of mass and radius for different compact stars [36] Compact star Table 3 Numerical data of AR 2 corresponding to observed mass and radius with reference to Table 1 for different values of n Compact stars n = −6.5 n = −10 n = −50 n = −500 n = −5000 n = −50,000 Table 4 Numerical data of AR 2 corresponding to observed mass and radius with reference to Table 1 for different values of n Compact stars n = −45 n = −100 n = −1000 n = −10,000 n = −100,000 viewed as a 'building' constant, that is to say, an increase in n is accompanied by an increase in mass, radius and charge which builds up the star from r = 0 through to the surface. In this work we have utilised n < 0 and the case n ≥ 0 was studied by [34]. Future work has been initiated to consider the case of general n.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the remaining constants A and a are obtained from (55) and (56), it explicitly reads However in order to close the matching conditions, the parametersM and R for strange star candidates have been used [47]. Tables 1, 2 and 3 shown all the constant parameters calculated for different values of the dimensionless coupling constant α.…”
Section: Junction Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the compactness parameter u, can be expresses in terms of the effective mass M e f f which for charged matter distribution is given by [55] M e f f = 4π…”
Section: Maximum Allowable Mass and Redshiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this simple and systematic method could be conveniently exploited in a large number of relevant cases, such as the Einstein-Maxwell [20] and Einstein-Klein-Gordon system [21][22][23][24], for higher derivative gravity [25][26][27], f (R)-theories of gravity [28][29][30][31][32][33][34], Hořava-aether gravity [35,36], polytropic spheres [37][38][39], among many others. In this respect, the simplest practical application of the MGD-decoupling consists in extending known isotropic and physically acceptable interior solutions for spherically symmetric self-gravitating systems into the anisotropic domain, at the same time preserving physical acceptability, which represents a highly non-trivial problem [40] (for obtaining anisotropic solutions in a generic way, see for instance Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%