1984
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.21.5.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A familial insertion involving an active nucleolar organiser within chromosome 12.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The transfer in tumor cells of rDNA to deleted chromosomes (Zankl and Huwer, 1978) and to terminal positions on the long arms of acrocentric chromosomes (Henderson and Megraw-Ripley, 1982) might involve similar mecha nisms, and insertion of an active NOR into a chro mosome 12 has been reported in three generations of a cancer-free family (Watt et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer in tumor cells of rDNA to deleted chromosomes (Zankl and Huwer, 1978) and to terminal positions on the long arms of acrocentric chromosomes (Henderson and Megraw-Ripley, 1982) might involve similar mecha nisms, and insertion of an active NOR into a chro mosome 12 has been reported in three generations of a cancer-free family (Watt et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCM-FISH showed in one step that this material was derived from an acrocentric short arm, once with and once without the NOR region. Similar reports are scarcely available in the literature (Watt et al 1984;Reddy and Sulcova 1998;Guttenbach et al 1998;Chen et al 2004). However, even such an insertion in an X chromosome was seen once (Tamagaki et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The third variety, interstitial insertion of satellite stalks (NOR) into nonacrocentric chromosomes, as observed in the 4 relatives we described, is the least frequent. We are aware of only 6 such familial cases [Watt et al, 1984;Cosper et al, 1985;Prieto et al, 1989;Reddy and Sulcova, 1998;Guttenbach et al, 1998Guttenbach et al, , 1999. They involved chromosomes 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12, were transmitted in a dominant fashion, and had no phenotypic effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%